東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How is Object-based Attention Modula...

Chen, Hui.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How is Object-based Attention Modulated by the Identicality between Targets?

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How is Object-based Attention Modulated by the Identicality between Targets?/
作者:	Chen, Hui.
面頁冊數:	116 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04B(E).
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3578012
ISBN:	9781303681523

How is Object-based Attention Modulated by the Identicality between Targets?
Chen, Hui.

How is Object-based Attention Modulated by the Identicality between Targets? - 116 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong), 2013.

The same-object advantage (SOA) effect is usually cited as evidence favoring the view of object-based attention. However, the different-object advantage (DOA) effect, which appears to be the opposite of the SOA effect, has also been reported by some researchers. The present study was designed to resolve this apparent inconsistency. In Study 1, I tested the robustness and generality of the DOA effect through a series of six experiments (Experiments 1-6) by exploiting different stimuli, tasks and paradigms. The results demonstrated that, as the well-documented SOA effect, the DOA effect was also a robust effect that can emerge under numerous circumstances, rather than just the byproducts of certain methods. These findings motived the second study in which I attempted to investigate the mechanism underlie DOA effect, as well as to explore critical factors that can predict the presences of SOA and DOA effects. Specifically, with a series of another five experiments (Experiments 7-11), I manipulated the identicality between two targets and found the SOA effect when the targets were different but the DOA effect when they were identical (even when the targets just share a common identity but different physical formats). These findings have been proved not just arose from any possible response bias. Taken together, the results of the present study demonstrate that 1) the DOA effect was also a robust effect as the SOA effect, and 2) the occurrences of SOA versus DOA effects can be critically determined by the identicality between targets.

ISBN: 9781303681523Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

How is Object-based Attention Modulated by the Identicality between Targets?
LDR:02471nam a2200289 4500 001 1966648
005 20141112075034.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303681523
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3578012
035 $a AAI3578012
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chen, Hui. $3 1084303
245 1 0 $a How is Object-based Attention Modulated by the Identicality between Targets?
300 $a 116 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Liqiang Huang.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong), 2013.
520 $a The same-object advantage (SOA) effect is usually cited as evidence favoring the view of object-based attention. However, the different-object advantage (DOA) effect, which appears to be the opposite of the SOA effect, has also been reported by some researchers. The present study was designed to resolve this apparent inconsistency. In Study 1, I tested the robustness and generality of the DOA effect through a series of six experiments (Experiments 1-6) by exploiting different stimuli, tasks and paradigms. The results demonstrated that, as the well-documented SOA effect, the DOA effect was also a robust effect that can emerge under numerous circumstances, rather than just the byproducts of certain methods. These findings motived the second study in which I attempted to investigate the mechanism underlie DOA effect, as well as to explore critical factors that can predict the presences of SOA and DOA effects. Specifically, with a series of another five experiments (Experiments 7-11), I manipulated the identicality between two targets and found the SOA effect when the targets were different but the DOA effect when they were identical (even when the targets just share a common identity but different physical formats). These findings have been proved not just arose from any possible response bias. Taken together, the results of the present study demonstrate that 1) the DOA effect was also a robust effect as the SOA effect, and 2) the occurrences of SOA versus DOA effects can be critically determined by the identicality between targets.
590 $a School code: 1307.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong). $3 1017547
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04B(E).
790 $a 1307
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3578012