東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The effect of failure on physiologic...

Gonzalez, Stephen Patrick.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The effect of failure on physiological stress, emotional responses, and performance in high and low resilient athletes.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The effect of failure on physiological stress, emotional responses, and performance in high and low resilient athletes./
作者:	Gonzalez, Stephen Patrick.
面頁冊數:	164 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-12B(E).
標題:	Health Sciences, Recreation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3592295
ISBN:	9781303332906

The effect of failure on physiological stress, emotional responses, and performance in high and low resilient athletes.
Gonzalez, Stephen Patrick.

The effect of failure on physiological stress, emotional responses, and performance in high and low resilient athletes. - 164 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Utah, 2013.

Resilience is distinguished by positive adaptation following adversity. All athletes inevitably experience adversity in sport, often in the guise of failure. Positive adaptation following failure is a highly desirable pattern of behavior in sport, yet little is known about the key markers of positive adaptation. Three theorized characteristics of positive adaptation from the literature are low cortisol levels, positive emotional responses, and good performances. With these characteristics in mind, the purpose of this psychophysiological study was to investigate cortisol, emotional, and performance differences following failure in more and less resilient athletes. To identify high and low resilient athletes for study, 116 male and female collegiate lacrosse players were initially recruited to self-assess their resilience. The initial survey pool was split into three groups using a mean +/- one standard deviation split from the resilience measure. High resilient athletes scored at or above the 84.1th percentile ( n= 18), low resilient qualities athletes scored at or below the 15.9 th percentile (n= 18), and the control group ( n= 17) scored at or around the mean. The task was a new lacrosse task where all participants except the control group were given failure feedback. All participants gave baseline, prefailure, and postfailure measures of positive and negative affect, pride and shame, and cortisol. Performance data on the task was collected on trial one and two of the task. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs to examine participants' responses to failure. There were no significant group by time interactions from prefailure to postfailure on cortisol, emotion, or performance. There were significant main effects for time, indicating that irregardless of resilience, all participants reacted similarly to failure. In addition, two exploratory analyses examined group differences from baseline to prefailure and a small subset of participants (n= 15), who received an additional condition where success feedback was given to examine group differences from presuccess to postsuccess. There was a significant group by time interaction for negative affect from baseline to prefailure. High resilient and control groups decreased in negative affect whereas the low resilient group increased. There were no significant findings regarding responses to success.

ISBN: 9781303332906Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018003
Health Sciences, Recreation.

The effect of failure on physiological stress, emotional responses, and performance in high and low resilient athletes.
LDR:03330nam a2200289 4500 001 1965924
005 20141124082812.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303332906
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3592295
035 $a AAI3592295
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gonzalez, Stephen Patrick. $3 2102675
245 1 4 $a The effect of failure on physiological stress, emotional responses, and performance in high and low resilient athletes.
300 $a 164 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Maria Newton.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Utah, 2013.
520 $a Resilience is distinguished by positive adaptation following adversity. All athletes inevitably experience adversity in sport, often in the guise of failure. Positive adaptation following failure is a highly desirable pattern of behavior in sport, yet little is known about the key markers of positive adaptation. Three theorized characteristics of positive adaptation from the literature are low cortisol levels, positive emotional responses, and good performances. With these characteristics in mind, the purpose of this psychophysiological study was to investigate cortisol, emotional, and performance differences following failure in more and less resilient athletes. To identify high and low resilient athletes for study, 116 male and female collegiate lacrosse players were initially recruited to self-assess their resilience. The initial survey pool was split into three groups using a mean +/- one standard deviation split from the resilience measure. High resilient athletes scored at or above the 84.1th percentile ( n= 18), low resilient qualities athletes scored at or below the 15.9 th percentile (n= 18), and the control group ( n= 17) scored at or around the mean. The task was a new lacrosse task where all participants except the control group were given failure feedback. All participants gave baseline, prefailure, and postfailure measures of positive and negative affect, pride and shame, and cortisol. Performance data on the task was collected on trial one and two of the task. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs to examine participants' responses to failure. There were no significant group by time interactions from prefailure to postfailure on cortisol, emotion, or performance. There were significant main effects for time, indicating that irregardless of resilience, all participants reacted similarly to failure. In addition, two exploratory analyses examined group differences from baseline to prefailure and a small subset of participants (n= 15), who received an additional condition where success feedback was given to examine group differences from presuccess to postsuccess. There was a significant group by time interaction for negative affect from baseline to prefailure. High resilient and control groups decreased in negative affect whereas the low resilient group increased. There were no significant findings regarding responses to success.
590 $a School code: 0240.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Recreation. $3 1018003
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a The University of Utah. $b Exercise and Sport Science. $3 1674557
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-12B(E).
790 $a 0240
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3592295