語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Do self determination theory premise...
~
Beaulieu, Melissa.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Do self determination theory premises apply to the disadvantaged?
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Do self determination theory premises apply to the disadvantaged?/
作者:
Beaulieu, Melissa.
面頁冊數:
96 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-06.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International51-06(E).
標題:
Psychology, General. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1538160
ISBN:
9781303109133
Do self determination theory premises apply to the disadvantaged?
Beaulieu, Melissa.
Do self determination theory premises apply to the disadvantaged?
- 96 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-06.
Thesis (M.A.)--Wake Forest University, 2013.
Self-Determination theory is arguably the most prominent within current perspectives on wellbeing and psychological needs. Data supporting the theory tend to negate the importance of needs tied to survival and reify Self-Determination Theory's needs of relatedness, autonomy and competence. However, most of the theory's experimental support comes from privileged (white, young and affluent) participants, which do not represent the disadvantaged communities wherein survival needs are more prevalent. The current study aimed at testing Self-Determination Theory against other needs (e.g., economic security) with an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse non-college sample by replicating a previous paradigm (Sheldon, Elliot, Kim, & Kasser, 2001). Seventy-three whites (31 women) and 55 blacks (34 women) constituted the final sample. Because economic security is linked with survival needs and tends to be more prevalent among the disadvantaged, participants with lower income levels were expected to perceive economic security as a salient aspect of life satisfaction more than affluent participants who would instead endorse self-determination theory needs more than disadvantaged people. The qualitative data show that whites alluded to relatedness and competence more than blacks did. There were no significant differences across racial and economic groups in participants' endorsement of self-determination theory needs within questionnaires. However, economic security was the most endorsed need overall and displayed a significant correlation with subjective wellbeing, independent of participants' racial and economic backgrounds.
ISBN: 9781303109133Subjects--Topical Terms:
1018034
Psychology, General.
Do self determination theory premises apply to the disadvantaged?
LDR
:02493nam a2200289 4500
001
1965802
005
20141124082751.5
008
150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781303109133
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI1538160
035
$a
AAI1538160
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Beaulieu, Melissa.
$3
2102519
245
1 0
$a
Do self determination theory premises apply to the disadvantaged?
300
$a
96 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 51-06.
500
$a
Adviser: Deborah Best.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--Wake Forest University, 2013.
520
$a
Self-Determination theory is arguably the most prominent within current perspectives on wellbeing and psychological needs. Data supporting the theory tend to negate the importance of needs tied to survival and reify Self-Determination Theory's needs of relatedness, autonomy and competence. However, most of the theory's experimental support comes from privileged (white, young and affluent) participants, which do not represent the disadvantaged communities wherein survival needs are more prevalent. The current study aimed at testing Self-Determination Theory against other needs (e.g., economic security) with an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse non-college sample by replicating a previous paradigm (Sheldon, Elliot, Kim, & Kasser, 2001). Seventy-three whites (31 women) and 55 blacks (34 women) constituted the final sample. Because economic security is linked with survival needs and tends to be more prevalent among the disadvantaged, participants with lower income levels were expected to perceive economic security as a salient aspect of life satisfaction more than affluent participants who would instead endorse self-determination theory needs more than disadvantaged people. The qualitative data show that whites alluded to relatedness and competence more than blacks did. There were no significant differences across racial and economic groups in participants' endorsement of self-determination theory needs within questionnaires. However, economic security was the most endorsed need overall and displayed a significant correlation with subjective wellbeing, independent of participants' racial and economic backgrounds.
590
$a
School code: 0248.
650
4
$a
Psychology, General.
$3
1018034
650
4
$a
Psychology, Physiological.
$3
1017869
650
4
$a
Psychology, Behavioral.
$3
1017677
690
$a
0621
690
$a
0989
690
$a
0384
710
2
$a
Wake Forest University.
$b
Psychology.
$3
1679409
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
51-06(E).
790
$a
0248
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2013
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1538160
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9260801
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入