東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Conscious and non-conscious bases of...

Sullivan, Susan D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment: Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment: Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict./
作者:	Sullivan, Susan D.
面頁冊數:	94 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-11B(E).
標題:	Psychology, Social. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3571438
ISBN:	9781303228100

Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment: Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict.
Sullivan, Susan D.

Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment: Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict. - 94 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2013.

Research on social judgment typically emphasizes one of three processes that enable unequivocal understanding of events with ambiguous causality. In the social influence perspective, people are susceptible to the interpretations offered by others. In the explicit attitudes perspective, people interpret events in line with their consciously held attitudes and values. In the implicit attitudes perspective, people interpret events in line with unconscious biases. The model investigated in the present study assumes that these processes vary in salience depending on people's mindset. When an event is encoded in high-level terms (i.e., its consequences), people's judgments reflect their explicit attitudes. When encoded in low-level terms (i.e., its details), however, such attitudes are less accessible, rendering people susceptible to social influence. In the absence of social influence, people with a lower-level mindset form judgments that reflect their relevant implicit attitudes. These hypotheses were tested in the context of an altercation between an African-American and a White male for which responsibility could reasonably be allocated to either party. Participants with low versus high implicit racial bias toward Blacks read a narrative concerning this altercation under either a low-level or a high-level mindset and then read a summary that blamed one of the parties or they did not read a summary. As predicted, low-level participants allocated responsibility to the African-American if they had a high implicit racial bias and to the White if they had a low implicit racial bias, regardless of the summary manipulation. Contrary to prediction, however, high-level participants' allocation of responsibility did not reflect their explicit prejudicial attitudes. Instead, they corrected for their implicit biases in their trait inferences and affective reactions, in line with research suggesting that a high-level mindset promotes self-regulatory processes in social judgment.

ISBN: 9781303228100Subjects--Topical Terms:

529430
Psychology, Social.

Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment: Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict.
LDR:02927nam a2200277 4500 001 1965565
005 20141030134121.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303228100
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3571438
035 $a AAI3571438
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sullivan, Susan D. $3 2102242
245 1 0 $a Conscious and non-conscious bases of social judgment: Mindset and implicit attitudes in the perception of intergroup conflict.
300 $a 94 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Robin R. Vallacher.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2013.
520 $a Research on social judgment typically emphasizes one of three processes that enable unequivocal understanding of events with ambiguous causality. In the social influence perspective, people are susceptible to the interpretations offered by others. In the explicit attitudes perspective, people interpret events in line with their consciously held attitudes and values. In the implicit attitudes perspective, people interpret events in line with unconscious biases. The model investigated in the present study assumes that these processes vary in salience depending on people's mindset. When an event is encoded in high-level terms (i.e., its consequences), people's judgments reflect their explicit attitudes. When encoded in low-level terms (i.e., its details), however, such attitudes are less accessible, rendering people susceptible to social influence. In the absence of social influence, people with a lower-level mindset form judgments that reflect their relevant implicit attitudes. These hypotheses were tested in the context of an altercation between an African-American and a White male for which responsibility could reasonably be allocated to either party. Participants with low versus high implicit racial bias toward Blacks read a narrative concerning this altercation under either a low-level or a high-level mindset and then read a summary that blamed one of the parties or they did not read a summary. As predicted, low-level participants allocated responsibility to the African-American if they had a high implicit racial bias and to the White if they had a low implicit racial bias, regardless of the summary manipulation. Contrary to prediction, however, high-level participants' allocation of responsibility did not reflect their explicit prejudicial attitudes. Instead, they corrected for their implicit biases in their trait inferences and affective reactions, in line with research suggesting that a high-level mindset promotes self-regulatory processes in social judgment.
590 $a School code: 0119.
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Florida Atlantic University. $b Psychology. $3 2102243
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-11B(E).
790 $a 0119
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3571438