東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Princeton Theory's Problematics.

Gleason, Scott Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Princeton Theory's Problematics.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Princeton Theory's Problematics./
作者:	Gleason, Scott Michael.
面頁冊數:	278 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02A(E).
標題:	Music. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600383
ISBN:	9781303504785

Princeton Theory's Problematics.
Gleason, Scott Michael.

Princeton Theory's Problematics. - 278 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2013.

This dissertation situates historically a group of philosophical problematics informing a thread of post-World War II American music theory, begun at Princeton University under Milton Babbitt (1916--2011) and his students. I historicize and demonstrate the logics behind, without attempting to explain away, problematic notions from experimentalism to experience, solipsism to ethics. Initially a formalist project, Princeton Theory in the early 1970's underwent an under-discussed Turn toward experimentalism, seemingly rejecting its earlier high-modernist orientation. The dissertation situates this Turn as an auto-critique and provides a variety of hermeneutics for the Turn. I discuss how Princeton Theory before the Turn problematically situated itself as both a logical positivist or empiricist discourse, wherein musical experience plays a foundational role, and a formalist, conceptual, discourse, complicating the claim that Princeton Theorists were unconcerned with music hearing as such. Because musical experience seems to be personal, not sharable, I historicize Princeton Theory's uneven appeals to the notion of solipsism---that only the listening or theorizing "I" exists---and question this position's implications for ethics, arguing that Babbitt and his students have been more concerned with ethics and morality than their formalist commitments may imply. This dissertation offers a sustained discussion and critique of mid-century high-modernist formalism, raising the stakes of our understanding of this foundational discourse for modern music theory by showing its historical situatedness, contentious status even for the practitioners involved, and what claims it may still make on our own musical imaginations.

ISBN: 9781303504785Subjects--Topical Terms:

516178
Music.

Princeton Theory's Problematics.
LDR:02588nam a2200289 4500 001 1965116
005 20141010093004.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303504785
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3600383
035 $a AAI3600383
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gleason, Scott Michael. $3 2101730
245 1 0 $a Princeton Theory's Problematics.
300 $a 278 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Joseph P. Dubiel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2013.
520 $a This dissertation situates historically a group of philosophical problematics informing a thread of post-World War II American music theory, begun at Princeton University under Milton Babbitt (1916--2011) and his students. I historicize and demonstrate the logics behind, without attempting to explain away, problematic notions from experimentalism to experience, solipsism to ethics. Initially a formalist project, Princeton Theory in the early 1970's underwent an under-discussed Turn toward experimentalism, seemingly rejecting its earlier high-modernist orientation. The dissertation situates this Turn as an auto-critique and provides a variety of hermeneutics for the Turn. I discuss how Princeton Theory before the Turn problematically situated itself as both a logical positivist or empiricist discourse, wherein musical experience plays a foundational role, and a formalist, conceptual, discourse, complicating the claim that Princeton Theorists were unconcerned with music hearing as such. Because musical experience seems to be personal, not sharable, I historicize Princeton Theory's uneven appeals to the notion of solipsism---that only the listening or theorizing "I" exists---and question this position's implications for ethics, arguing that Babbitt and his students have been more concerned with ethics and morality than their formalist commitments may imply. This dissertation offers a sustained discussion and critique of mid-century high-modernist formalism, raising the stakes of our understanding of this foundational discourse for modern music theory by showing its historical situatedness, contentious status even for the practitioners involved, and what claims it may still make on our own musical imaginations.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Music. $3 516178
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0582
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b Music. $3 1675649
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600383