東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Three Papers on and around the Acces...

Berry, Sharon.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Three Papers on and around the Access Problem.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Three Papers on and around the Access Problem./
作者:	Berry, Sharon.
面頁冊數:	93 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600139
ISBN:	9781303501401

Three Papers on and around the Access Problem.
Berry, Sharon.

Three Papers on and around the Access Problem. - 93 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2013.

The three papers which make up this dissertation form part of a larger project, which aims to solve the 'access problem' for realism about mathematics by providing a clear and plausible example of what a satisfying explanation of human accuracy about objective mathematical facts could look like. They fit into this project as follows.

ISBN: 9781303501401Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Three Papers on and around the Access Problem.
LDR:02464nam a2200325 4500 001 1965106
005 20141010093003.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303501401
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3600139
035 $a AAI3600139
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Berry, Sharon. $3 2101715
245 1 0 $a Three Papers on and around the Access Problem.
300 $a 93 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ned Hall.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2013.
520 $a The three papers which make up this dissertation form part of a larger project, which aims to solve the 'access problem' for realism about mathematics by providing a clear and plausible example of what a satisfying explanation of human accuracy about objective mathematical facts could look like. They fit into this project as follows.
520 $a The first paper argues that one cannot explain our use of good mathematical axioms and inference rules merely by saying that any syntactically consistent (mathematical) proof procedures we had accepted would have given meaning to our mathematical vocabulary in such a way as to ensure their own correctness.
520 $a The second paper outlines my core two-part strategy for solving the access problem: 1) reduce the problem of accounting for human access to mathematical facts to the problem of accounting for access to combinatorial possibility 2) use the fact that human beings face pressure to correctly predict and explain the behaviour of concrete objects to explain our possession of good methods of reasoning about combinatorial possibility. It largely focuses on part 2) of this story.
520 $a The third paper develops part 1) of the two-part story above. It motivates and helps defend a (loosely) neo-carnapian explanation for mathematicians' freedom to introduce new kinds of objects, like the complex numbers and the sets. If this neo-carnapian explanation is correct, then there's an easy route from the kind of accuracy about combinatorial possibility discussed in the second paper to accuracy about more familiar mathematical topics.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Theoretical Mathematics. $3 1672766
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0642
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Philosophy. $3 2101716
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02A(E).
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600139