東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Det...

Holmgren, Tatevik.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Detente to PD-59 and Limited Nuclear Strikes: Understanding the Change in the Carter Administration's Nuclear Strategy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Detente to PD-59 and Limited Nuclear Strikes: Understanding the Change in the Carter Administration's Nuclear Strategy./
作者:	Holmgren, Tatevik.
面頁冊數:	113 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-03(E).
標題:	Political Science, International Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1546878
ISBN:	9781303472497

From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Detente to PD-59 and Limited Nuclear Strikes: Understanding the Change in the Carter Administration's Nuclear Strategy.
Holmgren, Tatevik.

From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Detente to PD-59 and Limited Nuclear Strikes: Understanding the Change in the Carter Administration's Nuclear Strategy. - 113 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03.

Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2013.

President Jimmy Carter took office with the intention to halt nuclear proliferation, to implement reductions in the U.S. nuclear arsenal and to maintain detente with the Kremlin. Yet the president ended his tenure with more weapons programs in the works, a more explicit posture of nuclear war fighting, and dwindling Soviet-American relations. This thesis seeks to answer the following questions: Why did Carter change his mind? Why did his desire to reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal and to continue SALT negotiations with the Soviets instead turn into the issuance of Presidential Directive 59 (PD-59)? To what degree did America's NATO allies and/or the Soviet nuclear force structure influence the emergence of the new nuclear strategy? Was his dovish Secretary of State Cyrus Vance's 1980 resignation instrumental in Carter's inclination to sign PD-59 and to proceed with the countervailing strategy? What was the role of the civilian and military bureaucracies in shaping the Administration's nuclear posture? What was the countervailing strategy, and why did the Carter administration see it as the most befitting nuclear posture at the time?

ISBN: 9781303472497Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669648
Political Science, International Relations.

From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Detente to PD-59 and Limited Nuclear Strikes: Understanding the Change in the Carter Administration's Nuclear Strategy.
LDR:03807nam a2200301 4500 001 1964982
005 20141010092948.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303472497
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1546878
035 $a AAI1546878
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Holmgren, Tatevik. $3 2101549
245 1 0 $a From Nuclear Arms Reductions and Detente to PD-59 and Limited Nuclear Strikes: Understanding the Change in the Carter Administration's Nuclear Strategy.
300 $a 113 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03.
500 $a Adviser: Stephen M. Walt.
502 $a Thesis (A.L.M.)--Harvard University, 2013.
520 $a President Jimmy Carter took office with the intention to halt nuclear proliferation, to implement reductions in the U.S. nuclear arsenal and to maintain detente with the Kremlin. Yet the president ended his tenure with more weapons programs in the works, a more explicit posture of nuclear war fighting, and dwindling Soviet-American relations. This thesis seeks to answer the following questions: Why did Carter change his mind? Why did his desire to reduce the U.S. nuclear arsenal and to continue SALT negotiations with the Soviets instead turn into the issuance of Presidential Directive 59 (PD-59)? To what degree did America's NATO allies and/or the Soviet nuclear force structure influence the emergence of the new nuclear strategy? Was his dovish Secretary of State Cyrus Vance's 1980 resignation instrumental in Carter's inclination to sign PD-59 and to proceed with the countervailing strategy? What was the role of the civilian and military bureaucracies in shaping the Administration's nuclear posture? What was the countervailing strategy, and why did the Carter administration see it as the most befitting nuclear posture at the time?
520 $a Using historical analysis and mainly primary sources, I tested the hypothesis that both domestic and international impediments made detente and steep arms reduction unachievable goals during Carter's presidency. Ergo, the following study surveys the domestic and international factors that derailed President Carter's abolitionist plans and begot the Administration's decision to modify the U.S. declaratory policy and nuclear strategy.
520 $a Because of the hawks' overblown arguments vis-a-vis the Soviet conventional and nuclear superiority, Washington thought that NATO was militarily inferior and worried about the strategic forces balance. America's European allies also called for a better defense of Europe, emphasizing the need for theater nuclear force modernization. With the allies' concerns and the domestic opposition in sight, the Administration also had to counter the Soviet overseas incursions to defend American interests in the Persian Gulf region. The loss of an important ally to the Iranian Revolution and the later Soviet intervention in Afghanistan had weakened the Administration's strategic confidence. As the U.S. presidential elections neared, Carter and his team succumbed to the internal and external pressures to take an assertive stance toward the Soviets. The countervailing strategy presumably expressed that assertiveness by envisioning options and strengthening the U.S. deterrent. In reality, the resulting war plans were impractical and the weapons systems unnecessary. But the wave of anti-Sovietism, the demands of electoral politics, and the pressures engendered by the international crises trumped Carter's abolitionist plans and secured the triumph of nuclear theology.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0337
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Government. $3 2098260
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-03(E).
790 $a 0084
791 $a A.L.M.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1546878