東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

American Science Advocacy Organizati...

Rodriguez, Jason T.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

American Science Advocacy Organizations: Examining Their Strategies and Engagements with Religion.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	American Science Advocacy Organizations: Examining Their Strategies and Engagements with Religion./
作者:	Rodriguez, Jason T.
面頁冊數:	236 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-03(E).
標題:	Education, Sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1546967
ISBN:	9781303475580

American Science Advocacy Organizations: Examining Their Strategies and Engagements with Religion.
Rodriguez, Jason T.

American Science Advocacy Organizations: Examining Their Strategies and Engagements with Religion. - 236 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03.

Thesis (M.Ed.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2013.

Over the past several decades, science advocacy organizations have increasingly participated in discussions of the relationship between science and religion to the public, mainly to counteract the resurgence of anti-evolution activities across the country, to address misconceptions and misunderstandings about science and religion, and to help make science more palatable and less threatening to religious believers. These engagements with religion have primarily involved four organizations: the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), and the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (SNMNH). In their engagements with religion, each of these organizations has simultaneously employed two distinct lines of operation: (1) defending science against anti-science religions and movements and (2) engaging science-friendly religions and the religious public. These lines of operation are driven by key objectives and supported by specific strategies and tactics to achieve those objectives, which this paper seeks to explore and analyze. Key findings and recommendations for science advocacy organizations' ongoing and future engagements with religion are provided.

ISBN: 9781303475580Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017897
Education, Sciences.

American Science Advocacy Organizations: Examining Their Strategies and Engagements with Religion.
LDR:02177nam a2200277 4500 001 1964364
005 20141010092018.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303475580
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1546967
035 $a AAI1546967
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rodriguez, Jason T. $3 2100800
245 1 0 $a American Science Advocacy Organizations: Examining Their Strategies and Engagements with Religion.
300 $a 236 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-03.
500 $a Advisers: Xiufeng Liu; John R. Shook.
502 $a Thesis (M.Ed.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2013.
520 $a Over the past several decades, science advocacy organizations have increasingly participated in discussions of the relationship between science and religion to the public, mainly to counteract the resurgence of anti-evolution activities across the country, to address misconceptions and misunderstandings about science and religion, and to help make science more palatable and less threatening to religious believers. These engagements with religion have primarily involved four organizations: the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), and the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History (SNMNH). In their engagements with religion, each of these organizations has simultaneously employed two distinct lines of operation: (1) defending science against anti-science religions and movements and (2) engaging science-friendly religions and the religious public. These lines of operation are driven by key objectives and supported by specific strategies and tactics to achieve those objectives, which this paper seeks to explore and analyze. Key findings and recommendations for science advocacy organizations' ongoing and future engagements with religion are provided.
590 $a School code: 0656.
650 4 $a Education, Sciences. $3 1017897
650 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 894954
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0402
710 2 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $b Learning and Instruction. $3 1026373
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-03(E).
790 $a 0656
791 $a M.Ed.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1546967