東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Validating task-based assessment of ...

Youn, Soo Jung.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods./
作者:	Youn, Soo Jung.
面頁冊數:	202 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-03A(E).
標題:	Education, English as a Second Language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3577270
ISBN:	9781303590221

Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods.
Youn, Soo Jung.

Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods. - 202 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2013.

This study investigates the validity for task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) setting for classroom assessment and meaningful score interpretations for stakeholders. As a validity framework, Kane's (2006) argument-based approach to validity was employed. In view of the complexity of assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction and score interpretations from observed L2 pragmatic performances, score interpretations were built upon interpretive arguments comprising of four inferences, which guided the types of data analyzed and research steps taken in this study. Using the sequential mixed methods approach (Green, 2007; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003), qualitative and quantitative evidence was collected to provide valid support for the inferences and to strengthen the validity argument.

ISBN: 9781303590221Subjects--Topical Terms:

1030294
Education, English as a Second Language.

Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods.
LDR:04015nam a2200301 4500 001 1964250
005 20141015113820.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303590221
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3577270
035 $a AAI3577270
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Youn, Soo Jung. $3 2100665
245 1 0 $a Validating task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods.
300 $a 202 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: James Dean Brown.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2013.
520 $a This study investigates the validity for task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) setting for classroom assessment and meaningful score interpretations for stakeholders. As a validity framework, Kane's (2006) argument-based approach to validity was employed. In view of the complexity of assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction and score interpretations from observed L2 pragmatic performances, score interpretations were built upon interpretive arguments comprising of four inferences, which guided the types of data analyzed and research steps taken in this study. Using the sequential mixed methods approach (Green, 2007; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003), qualitative and quantitative evidence was collected to provide valid support for the inferences and to strengthen the validity argument.
520 $a Based on a large-scale needs analysis on EAP L2 pragmatic learning needs, two open role-play tasks that are meaningful and relevant to stakeholders in an EAP context were developed. Unlike the closed role-play task format, examinees were allowed to negotiate and naturally interact with interlocutors. In order to provide meaningful score interpretations to the stakeholders and to assist raters in making accurate evaluations of examinees' interaction-involved L2 pragmatic performance, conversation analysis (CA)- informed analytical rating criteria with detailed descriptions were developed based on the detailed analyses of examinees' L2 pragmatic performances in the role-play tasks. One hundred two adult ESL examinees completed the role-play tasks and monologic tasks. Four rater groups, consisting of 12 raters in total, scored each examinee's pragmatic performance. A many-facet Rasch measurement using FACETS (Linacre, 2006) indicated that the role-play tasks displayed different levels of difficulty, which stably differentiated between the varying degrees of the 102 examinees' pragmatic abilities. The raters showed internal consistency despite their different degrees of severity. Stable fit statistics and distinct difficulties were reported within each of the interaction-sensitive rating criteria, indicating that they contribute to measuring L2 pragmatic competence. In particular, the two rating categories for interactional competence were distinct in their difficulty levels, which supports the CA findings.
520 $a Based on the qualitative and quantitative analyses, all of the validity evidence was woven into the validity argument for task-based assessment of L2 pragmatics in interaction, focusing on the four types of inference, domain description, evaluation, generalization, and extrapolation. The current study exemplifies how the construct of L2 pragmatics in interaction can be operationalized based on the qualitative scrutiny of the target performance that is also supported by the quantitative findings, which contributes to the advancement of measuring L2 pragmatics. Lastly, this study provides additional grounds for the recent development of the validity argument approach in the field of language assessment at large.
590 $a School code: 0085.
650 4 $a Education, English as a Second Language. $3 1030294
650 4 $a Education, Tests and Measurements. $3 1017589
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a University of Hawai'i at Manoa. $3 1017511
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-03A(E).
790 $a 0085
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3577270