東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A distinction without a moral differ...

Wayne State University., Philosophy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A distinction without a moral difference? An essay on the difference between palliative sedation and physician-assisted death.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A distinction without a moral difference? An essay on the difference between palliative sedation and physician-assisted death./
作者:	Smith, Patrick T.
面頁冊數:	255 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02B(E).
標題:	Health Sciences, Medical Ethics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3601750
ISBN:	9781303533846

A distinction without a moral difference? An essay on the difference between palliative sedation and physician-assisted death.
Smith, Patrick T.

A distinction without a moral difference? An essay on the difference between palliative sedation and physician-assisted death. - 255 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2013.

Professionals engaged in palliative care have a responsibility to treat their patients by aggressively managing pain and certain kinds of suffering within legal and professional ethical boundaries. Many medical professionals and ethicists, rightly or wrongly, have considered the practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, which can be categorized as instances of physician-assisted death (PAD), to be beyond the scope of ethically appropriate health care. Many of these same individuals who oppose PAD, and the professional organizations they sometimes represent, often embrace, at the same time, the practice of palliative/terminal sedation at the end of life. Palliative sedation is thought to be an advance in palliative care that has alleviated the need for PAD when managing otherwise intractable pain in dying patients. However, there is some question as to whether this procedure is sufficiently distinct, ethically speaking, from instances of various forms of PAD and that it actually constitutes a compromise. It may be argued that if there is no legitimate moral distinction between the two sets of practices, then instances of PAD should be legal and morally legitimate end-of-life treatment options for patients along with palliative sedation. If this view is correct, then those who support the use of sedation in end-of-life palliative care should have no problem with the practice of PAD. If they were to think or act otherwise would be ethically and professionally inconsistent. The primary question of this dissertation is to determine whether or not medical professionals and others invested in this area are ethically consistent if they reject PAD while embracing the practice of palliative/terminal sedation. So this project is to be considered a work in applied analytic bioethics. I argue that there are both conceptual and empirical reasons for maintaining that there are morally relevant differences between PAD and palliative/terminal sedation for those who have some reasons to think the former is ethically problematic. Therefore, those who are morally and professionally opposed to PAD for certain reasons are not necessarily being inconsistent in their support of palliative/terminal sedation as a legitimate treatment at the end-of-life when the latter is carefully defined, understood, and practiced.

ISBN: 9781303533846Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669715
Health Sciences, Medical Ethics.

A distinction without a moral difference? An essay on the difference between palliative sedation and physician-assisted death.
LDR:03288nam a2200289 4500 001 1963668
005 20141007080204.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303533846
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3601750
035 $a AAI3601750
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Smith, Patrick T. $3 2099973
245 1 2 $a A distinction without a moral difference? An essay on the difference between palliative sedation and physician-assisted death.
300 $a 255 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Bruce Russell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2013.
520 $a Professionals engaged in palliative care have a responsibility to treat their patients by aggressively managing pain and certain kinds of suffering within legal and professional ethical boundaries. Many medical professionals and ethicists, rightly or wrongly, have considered the practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, which can be categorized as instances of physician-assisted death (PAD), to be beyond the scope of ethically appropriate health care. Many of these same individuals who oppose PAD, and the professional organizations they sometimes represent, often embrace, at the same time, the practice of palliative/terminal sedation at the end of life. Palliative sedation is thought to be an advance in palliative care that has alleviated the need for PAD when managing otherwise intractable pain in dying patients. However, there is some question as to whether this procedure is sufficiently distinct, ethically speaking, from instances of various forms of PAD and that it actually constitutes a compromise. It may be argued that if there is no legitimate moral distinction between the two sets of practices, then instances of PAD should be legal and morally legitimate end-of-life treatment options for patients along with palliative sedation. If this view is correct, then those who support the use of sedation in end-of-life palliative care should have no problem with the practice of PAD. If they were to think or act otherwise would be ethically and professionally inconsistent. The primary question of this dissertation is to determine whether or not medical professionals and others invested in this area are ethically consistent if they reject PAD while embracing the practice of palliative/terminal sedation. So this project is to be considered a work in applied analytic bioethics. I argue that there are both conceptual and empirical reasons for maintaining that there are morally relevant differences between PAD and palliative/terminal sedation for those who have some reasons to think the former is ethically problematic. Therefore, those who are morally and professionally opposed to PAD for certain reasons are not necessarily being inconsistent in their support of palliative/terminal sedation as a legitimate treatment at the end-of-life when the latter is carefully defined, understood, and practiced.
590 $a School code: 0254.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Medical Ethics. $3 1669715
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0497
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $b Philosophy. $3 2099974
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02B(E).
790 $a 0254
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3601750