東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Peer and self review: A holistic exa...

Johnson, Kara Grace.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Peer and self review: A holistic examination of EFL learners' writing and review process.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Peer and self review: A holistic examination of EFL learners' writing and review process./
作者:	Johnson, Kara Grace.
面頁冊數:	228 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-10A(E).
標題:	Education, English as a Second Language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3510037
ISBN:	9781267371225

Peer and self review: A holistic examination of EFL learners' writing and review process.
Johnson, Kara Grace.

Peer and self review: A holistic examination of EFL learners' writing and review process. - 228 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2012.

This dissertation uses a mixed methods design to explore the process of EFL students' writing and peer review, setting up a paradigm of peer compared to self review, with teacher support. The findings that surfaced were identified in themes, with the most overarching theme being that the value of peer review came not from the actual feedback that the peers gave each other, but rather from the collaborative process of peer review. Students who were actively engaged in peer review often did not take the exact advice given, but the process of exchanging feedback followed by face-to-face discussion prompted them to think of new ideas of their own that they incorporated into their revisions.

ISBN: 9781267371225Subjects--Topical Terms:

1030294
Education, English as a Second Language.

Peer and self review: A holistic examination of EFL learners' writing and review process.
LDR:03207nam a2200313 4500 001 1963138
005 20140923134343.5
008 150210s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267371225
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3510037
035 $a AAI3510037
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnson, Kara Grace. $3 2099315
245 1 0 $a Peer and self review: A holistic examination of EFL learners' writing and review process.
300 $a 228 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jun Liu.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2012.
520 $a This dissertation uses a mixed methods design to explore the process of EFL students' writing and peer review, setting up a paradigm of peer compared to self review, with teacher support. The findings that surfaced were identified in themes, with the most overarching theme being that the value of peer review came not from the actual feedback that the peers gave each other, but rather from the collaborative process of peer review. Students who were actively engaged in peer review often did not take the exact advice given, but the process of exchanging feedback followed by face-to-face discussion prompted them to think of new ideas of their own that they incorporated into their revisions.
520 $a The following findings are related to this major one. (1) Both the writing proficiency of the student writers and the understanding they have of the feedback given have a symbiotic relationship and greatly affect how they apply feedback. In this study, students at higher writing proficiencies tended to include some abstract feedback, but regardless of the students' writing levels, their partners' were able to make revisions at their own level of proficiency. (2) Both peer and self reviewing students made revisions based more on their own inspirations and ownership of ideas rather than on the exact advice exchanged between partners. Often, students developed and incorporated ideas that appeared to be generated from the peer feedback and discussion, pointing to the significance of peer collaboration and discussion in the writing process. (3) Although previous studies have suggested that non-native speakers' tendency to give feedback on grammatical issues as a drawback, the in-depth examination here reveals a more positive perspective. Even when comments, such as regarding grammar, were rated as "incorrect," students were often able to make positive changes, such as rewording or reorganizing.
520 $a The results brings insights to the impact of abstract feedback for varying proficiency levels, ownership of ideas, internalization of concepts, and interdependence in the collaborative peer review process within a Vygotskian framework of concept development and the ZPD. Implications for research, writing program administrators, and writing instructors are identified.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Education, English as a Second Language. $3 1030294
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Second Language Acquisition & Teaching. $3 1020442
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-10A(E).
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3510037