東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Women's doctoral student experiences...

Masterman, Ann Katherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Women's doctoral student experiences and degree progress in education versus engineering.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Women's doctoral student experiences and degree progress in education versus engineering./
作者:	Masterman, Ann Katherine.
面頁冊數:	324 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-08A(E).
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3617427
ISBN:	9781303848414

Women's doctoral student experiences and degree progress in education versus engineering.
Masterman, Ann Katherine.

Women's doctoral student experiences and degree progress in education versus engineering. - 324 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2014.

This study's purpose was to compare the lived experiences of doctoral women studying Education, a prototypically female field, with women studying Engineering, a prototypically male field to illustrate the phenomenon of doctoral degree progress in the two fields. Using critical feminist theory and Valian's (1999) concept of gender schemas, this study examined doctoral education culture in Education and Engineering and how these cultures influence women's doctoral student experiences and in turn their degree progress (Tong, 2009).

ISBN: 9781303848414Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Women's doctoral student experiences and degree progress in education versus engineering.
LDR:03329nam a2200325 4500 001 1962734
005 20140819094538.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303848414
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3617427
035 $a AAI3617427
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Masterman, Ann Katherine. $3 2098842
245 1 0 $a Women's doctoral student experiences and degree progress in education versus engineering.
300 $a 324 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Heather Rowan-Kenyon.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2014.
520 $a This study's purpose was to compare the lived experiences of doctoral women studying Education, a prototypically female field, with women studying Engineering, a prototypically male field to illustrate the phenomenon of doctoral degree progress in the two fields. Using critical feminist theory and Valian's (1999) concept of gender schemas, this study examined doctoral education culture in Education and Engineering and how these cultures influence women's doctoral student experiences and in turn their degree progress (Tong, 2009).
520 $a Although women represent over 50% of doctoral student enrollment and degrees earned, gender disparities exist in Education and Engineering. Once enrolled, women are proportionally more likely to complete Education doctorates and less likely to complete Engineering doctorates (Council of Graduate Schools, 2008; Gonzales, Allum, & Sowell, 2013; Nettles & Millett, 2006). This trend is important because it implies there is something about Education and Engineering doctoral environments that make them more and less conducive for women's success, respectively (Gardner & Mendoza, 2010).
520 $a This study used a qualitative interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach to capture the essence of women's doctoral degree progress by interpreting the lived experiences of 10 Education and 11 Engineering doctoral women (Smith, Flowers, & Larkin, 2009). After 63 in-depth interviews and two focus groups, four themes emerged.
520 $a Overall, the Education women reported fewer positive doctoral experiences and more barriers to degree progress than the Engineering women due to the funding and research assistantship structure, the faculty advisor relationship, and the department environment. Both groups of women described doctoral education culture as proactive, independent, and competitive - characteristics more consistent with masculine gender schemas. Doctoral education culture also reflected the feminine gender schemas of flexibility and collegiality/collaboration, which were more apparent in the prototypically masculine Engineering field than in the prototypically feminine Education field. Implications for how doctoral education can be re-conceptualized, delivered, and researched are provided, calling for the incorporation of more feminine gender schemas into doctoral education culture in order to promote and achieve gender equity.
590 $a School code: 0016.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Higher Education Administration. $3 1669382
650 4 $a Women's Studies. $3 1017481
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0453
710 2 $a Boston College. $b LSOE - Educational Leadership and Higher Education. $3 2098843
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-08A(E).
790 $a 0016
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3617427