東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Biofeedback's effect on sports perfo...

Oppermann, Paulo.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Biofeedback's effect on sports performance: A meta-analysis and analysis of moderators.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Biofeedback's effect on sports performance: A meta-analysis and analysis of moderators./
作者:	Oppermann, Paulo.
面頁冊數:	220 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02B(E).
標題:	Psychology, Physiological. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3575347
ISBN:	9781303531781

Biofeedback's effect on sports performance: A meta-analysis and analysis of moderators.
Oppermann, Paulo.

Biofeedback's effect on sports performance: A meta-analysis and analysis of moderators. - 220 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Boston University, 2013.

Since the late 1970s, research and applied work has focused on the use of biofeedback as a technique to assist in the development of sports performance through different means, including improvement of sports skills, reduction of injuries, and improvement of muscle strength, among others. However, there is no scientific work statistically comparing these implementations using biofeedback. A meta-analysis was designed towards this gap in the literature; 33 investigations were gathered and statistically compared. Dependent variables, (e.g. the type of biofeedback, and the number of biofeedback sessions) were treated as moderators and their effect on the overall analysis were calculated. A random effect model was used due to the presence of heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 54.95 (p<0.001, 95% CI), that included variations on the studies' compared outcomes. The meta-analysis' overall result showed a significant effect of biofeedback interventions on sports performance through a strong effect size, d = 0.72, with a high significance Z = 6.77, p < 0.001, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 -- 0.93). Significant moderators' effects were found indicating that studies using EMG modality (d = 0.891, 95% CI 0.60 -- 1.18, p < 0.001 , Z = 6.05), studies with the number of sessions higher than 8 (d = 0.84, 95% CI 0.40 -- 1.27, p < 0.001 , Z = 3.77), studies targeting outcomes indirectly linked to sports performance (d = 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 -- 1.22, p < 0.001 , Z = 5.64), and studies using biofeedback along with other interventions (d = 0.90, 95% CI 0.48 -- 1.32, p < 0.001 , Z = 4.18) had higher effect on the overall analysis.

ISBN: 9781303531781Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017869
Psychology, Physiological.

Biofeedback's effect on sports performance: A meta-analysis and analysis of moderators.
LDR:03208nam a2200313 4500 001 1961435
005 20140708115057.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303531781
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3575347
035 $a AAI3575347
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Oppermann, Paulo. $3 2097322
245 1 0 $a Biofeedback's effect on sports performance: A meta-analysis and analysis of moderators.
300 $a 220 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Amy Baltzell.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Boston University, 2013.
520 $a Since the late 1970s, research and applied work has focused on the use of biofeedback as a technique to assist in the development of sports performance through different means, including improvement of sports skills, reduction of injuries, and improvement of muscle strength, among others. However, there is no scientific work statistically comparing these implementations using biofeedback. A meta-analysis was designed towards this gap in the literature; 33 investigations were gathered and statistically compared. Dependent variables, (e.g. the type of biofeedback, and the number of biofeedback sessions) were treated as moderators and their effect on the overall analysis were calculated. A random effect model was used due to the presence of heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 54.95 (p<0.001, 95% CI), that included variations on the studies' compared outcomes. The meta-analysis' overall result showed a significant effect of biofeedback interventions on sports performance through a strong effect size, d = 0.72, with a high significance Z = 6.77, p < 0.001, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 -- 0.93). Significant moderators' effects were found indicating that studies using EMG modality (d = 0.891, 95% CI 0.60 -- 1.18, p < 0.001 , Z = 6.05), studies with the number of sessions higher than 8 (d = 0.84, 95% CI 0.40 -- 1.27, p < 0.001 , Z = 3.77), studies targeting outcomes indirectly linked to sports performance (d = 0.91, 95% CI 0.59 -- 1.22, p < 0.001 , Z = 5.64), and studies using biofeedback along with other interventions (d = 0.90, 95% CI 0.48 -- 1.32, p < 0.001 , Z = 4.18) had higher effect on the overall analysis.
520 $a The meta-analysis findings are an important reference for researchers and practitioners using biofeedback, because they indicate that biofeedback interventions have a positive effect on sports performance. Moreover, the meta-analysis point to methodological factors playing an important role on interventions using biofeedback, as studies that had a greater effect were those with methods using EMG biofeedback modality, studies with more than eight biofeedback sessions, studies focusing on outcome measures indirectly related to sports performance, and studies that included biofeedback interventions along with other interventions.
590 $a School code: 0017.
650 4 $a Psychology, Physiological. $3 1017869
650 4 $a Biology, Physiology. $3 1017816
650 4 $a Education, Physical. $3 1018000
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Recreation. $3 1018003
690 $a 0989
690 $a 0719
690 $a 0523
690 $a 0575
710 2 $a Boston University. $b Counseling and Human Development. $3 2097323
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02B(E).
790 $a 0017
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3575347