東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The paradox of indigenous sovereignt...

Jones, Benjamin Bahe.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The paradox of indigenous sovereignty and American democracy: Discourse of exclusion in Navajo water rights.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The paradox of indigenous sovereignty and American democracy: Discourse of exclusion in Navajo water rights./
作者:	Jones, Benjamin Bahe.
面頁冊數:	336 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1944.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-05A.
標題:	Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3490520
ISBN:	9781267114228

The paradox of indigenous sovereignty and American democracy: Discourse of exclusion in Navajo water rights.
Jones, Benjamin Bahe.

The paradox of indigenous sovereignty and American democracy: Discourse of exclusion in Navajo water rights. - 336 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1944.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 2011.

The water rights to the Colorado River have been under negotiations since at least 1922 when seven western states enacted the Colorado River Compact. These negotiations have had a significant impact on the Navajo people. This dissertation focuses on the negotiations over water rights through an analysis of the ambiguities with regard to Navajo sovereignty, the federal Indian trust relationship, and American liberal democracy. The theoretical framework is grounded in Michel Foucault's discourse theory and supporting ideas from the literature on postmodernism, poststructuralism, postcolonialism, and constructivism. The methodology emphasizes Foucault's approach to discern the power struggles inherent in language and knowledge production. These spaces of struggles, however, do not occur in an ahistorical vacuum; rather they are contextualized within a parallel historical evolution of American liberal democracy and Indigenous sovereignty that reinforces the policy paradoxes of the Federal Indian Trust Doctrine and Navajo sovereignty.

ISBN: 9781267114228Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017909
Sociology, Public and Social Welfare.

The paradox of indigenous sovereignty and American democracy: Discourse of exclusion in Navajo water rights.
LDR:02760nam a2200301 4500 001 1961165
005 20140701145355.5
008 150210s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267114228
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3490520
035 $a AAI3490520
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jones, Benjamin Bahe. $3 2096992
245 1 4 $a The paradox of indigenous sovereignty and American democracy: Discourse of exclusion in Navajo water rights.
300 $a 336 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-05, Section: A, page: 1944.
500 $a Adviser: Mary Ann E. Steger.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northern Arizona University, 2011.
520 $a The water rights to the Colorado River have been under negotiations since at least 1922 when seven western states enacted the Colorado River Compact. These negotiations have had a significant impact on the Navajo people. This dissertation focuses on the negotiations over water rights through an analysis of the ambiguities with regard to Navajo sovereignty, the federal Indian trust relationship, and American liberal democracy. The theoretical framework is grounded in Michel Foucault's discourse theory and supporting ideas from the literature on postmodernism, poststructuralism, postcolonialism, and constructivism. The methodology emphasizes Foucault's approach to discern the power struggles inherent in language and knowledge production. These spaces of struggles, however, do not occur in an ahistorical vacuum; rather they are contextualized within a parallel historical evolution of American liberal democracy and Indigenous sovereignty that reinforces the policy paradoxes of the Federal Indian Trust Doctrine and Navajo sovereignty.
520 $a The fundamental premise is that the American liberal democratic experiment has not treated Native Americans as equal citizens. This research probes the question of how American democracy has failed to recognize the pre-colonial Native nations as distinct sovereign entities and challenges the Navajos to engage in a more substantive exercise of their sovereignty. The study is a microcosm for analyzing discursive practices associated with water policies and assesses the extent to which Navajo people and their sovereignty were excluded from negotiations over water rights. Despite the negative consequences of their historic struggles, Native people's survival suggests that vibrancy of Native languages is fundamental to the endurance of their sovereignty.
590 $a School code: 0391.
650 4 $a Sociology, Public and Social Welfare. $3 1017909
650 4 $a Native American Studies. $3 626633
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0740
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Northern Arizona University. $b Politics and International Affairs. $3 2096993
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-05A.
790 $a 0391
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3490520