東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Relationship of Distributed Expe...

Moose, Alida Milligan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Relationship of Distributed Expertise and Shared Leadership in New Product Development Teams: A Comparative Case Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Relationship of Distributed Expertise and Shared Leadership in New Product Development Teams: A Comparative Case Study./
作者:	Moose, Alida Milligan.
面頁冊數:	193 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-06A(E).
標題:	Sociology, Organizational. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3551317
ISBN:	9781267888921

The Relationship of Distributed Expertise and Shared Leadership in New Product Development Teams: A Comparative Case Study.
Moose, Alida Milligan.

The Relationship of Distributed Expertise and Shared Leadership in New Product Development Teams: A Comparative Case Study. - 193 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2013.

As we interact within a broader economic environment, our understanding of the role of expertise needs to evolve to where the role of the leader and expert are not necessarily synonymous. Knowledge-based work relies on expertise, and organizations depend more on knowledge workers than on singular leaders. Dimensions such as task interdependence and the sharing of responsibility lay the groundwork for expertise to play an important role in new product development. To better understand how expertise and shared leadership occur in a team setting and how they relate to each other, teams of product experts offered contexts for study. This comparative case study describes how leadership is shared and expertise is distributed in team interaction to facilitate new product development.

ISBN: 9781267888921Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018023
Sociology, Organizational.

The Relationship of Distributed Expertise and Shared Leadership in New Product Development Teams: A Comparative Case Study.
LDR:03285nam a2200313 4500 001 1960739
005 20140624205959.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267888921
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3551317
035 $a AAI3551317
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Moose, Alida Milligan. $3 2096449
245 1 4 $a The Relationship of Distributed Expertise and Shared Leadership in New Product Development Teams: A Comparative Case Study.
300 $a 193 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: David R. Schwandt.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2013.
520 $a As we interact within a broader economic environment, our understanding of the role of expertise needs to evolve to where the role of the leader and expert are not necessarily synonymous. Knowledge-based work relies on expertise, and organizations depend more on knowledge workers than on singular leaders. Dimensions such as task interdependence and the sharing of responsibility lay the groundwork for expertise to play an important role in new product development. To better understand how expertise and shared leadership occur in a team setting and how they relate to each other, teams of product experts offered contexts for study. This comparative case study describes how leadership is shared and expertise is distributed in team interaction to facilitate new product development.
520 $a During this research, it was discovered that expertise is displayed as team behavior. For instance, when the content of the subject matter was easily understood by most team members, social influence was displayed more prominently in team interaction. However, when the topic was highly complex, team members deferred to the expert in the team. Due to their interdependency, team members operated in a symbiotic manner as they relinquished opportunity to present their own opinions and ideas to receive valuable input from their more expert peers. Therefore, deference was triggered by the content and complexity of the subject matter. The second conclusion concerned the evidence of one's expertise over time. Trusting relationships formed from the evidence of expertise and not the status one's role represented. The third conclusion suggested presenting facts with an emotionally powerful delivery was more influential than facts alone. However, emotions accompanying an opinion did not have the same effect as emotions accompanying facts from an expert.
520 $a Other findings included the role of humor, which helped steer the team through highly technical conversations where individual team members were challenged by the complexity of the dialogue. Humorous exchanges set the stage to socially reconnect and leverage each other's unique expertise to advance shared objectives. Overall, this study presents shared leadership and distributed expertise as two sides of the same coin--as two facets of team influence.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a Sociology, Organization Theory. $3 1669248
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Education and Human Development. $3 1018508
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-06A(E).
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3551317