東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A human end to history? Hans Blumenb...

Kroll, Joe Paul.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A human end to history? Hans Blumenberg, Karl Loewith and Carl Schmitt on secularization and modernity.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A human end to history? Hans Blumenberg, Karl Loewith and Carl Schmitt on secularization and modernity./
作者:	Kroll, Joe Paul.
面頁冊數:	316 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2603.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-07A.
標題:	History, European. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3414164
ISBN:	9781124070827

A human end to history? Hans Blumenberg, Karl Loewith and Carl Schmitt on secularization and modernity.
Kroll, Joe Paul.

A human end to history? Hans Blumenberg, Karl Loewith and Carl Schmitt on secularization and modernity. - 316 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2603.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2010.

Against the intellectual backdrop of mounting uncertainty concerning the secular nature of modernity, the present study reconstructs a philosophical debate in Germany, concerning the origins and legitimacy of the modern age as a secular age. This debate was carried out between Hans Blumenberg, Karl Lowith and Carl Schmitt, between about 1950 and 1980. Blumenberg's little-known early work is considered as a preliminary to his best-known book, Die Legitimitat der Neuzeit, in which he attacked Schmitt and Lowith for propounding versions of a theorem whereby modern thought consisted of "secularized" religious matter. It is also shown to develop other core concepts, notably that of human self-assertion, whilst being charted against Blumenberg's own intellectual self-assertion, his struggle to find a distinctive voice. A historical discussion of the concept of secularization is followed by an examination of Lowith's derivation of the progressivist philosophy of history from Christian eschatology, which is shown to be less straightforward than Lowith's popularizers assumed. Lowith's personal confrontation with Blumenberg having been shown to conceal a deeper affinity in the rejection of apocalyptic thought, the focus shifts to Schmitt's political-theological critique of modernity. Schmitt deploys the secularization theorem to call into question the human autonomy on which Blumenberg founds the modern age's claim to legitimacy. Schmitt is shown to argue against what he perceived to be a human plan to terminate history in an earthly utopia, precluding a divine judgment on history and man. The subsequent debate between Blumenberg and Schmitt in letters and texts reveals fundamental differences concerning the status of man with regard to the absolute, with Schmitt's concept of antagonistic, absolute potencies being pitched against Blumenberg's vision of a division of powers, which he discusses in terms of the myth of Prometheus. In arguing for the autonomy of the modern age, Blumenberg is shown to challenge critiques of civilization which avail themselves of religious rhetoric for political ends.

ISBN: 9781124070827Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018076
History, European.

A human end to history? Hans Blumenberg, Karl Loewith and Carl Schmitt on secularization and modernity.
LDR:03050nam a2200289 4500 001 1960408
005 20140616133310.5
008 150210s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124070827
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3414164
035 $a AAI3414164
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kroll, Joe Paul. $3 2096061
245 1 2 $a A human end to history? Hans Blumenberg, Karl Loewith and Carl Schmitt on secularization and modernity.
300 $a 316 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-07, Section: A, page: 2603.
500 $a Adviser: Anson G. Rabinbach.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2010.
520 $a Against the intellectual backdrop of mounting uncertainty concerning the secular nature of modernity, the present study reconstructs a philosophical debate in Germany, concerning the origins and legitimacy of the modern age as a secular age. This debate was carried out between Hans Blumenberg, Karl Lowith and Carl Schmitt, between about 1950 and 1980. Blumenberg's little-known early work is considered as a preliminary to his best-known book, Die Legitimitat der Neuzeit, in which he attacked Schmitt and Lowith for propounding versions of a theorem whereby modern thought consisted of "secularized" religious matter. It is also shown to develop other core concepts, notably that of human self-assertion, whilst being charted against Blumenberg's own intellectual self-assertion, his struggle to find a distinctive voice. A historical discussion of the concept of secularization is followed by an examination of Lowith's derivation of the progressivist philosophy of history from Christian eschatology, which is shown to be less straightforward than Lowith's popularizers assumed. Lowith's personal confrontation with Blumenberg having been shown to conceal a deeper affinity in the rejection of apocalyptic thought, the focus shifts to Schmitt's political-theological critique of modernity. Schmitt deploys the secularization theorem to call into question the human autonomy on which Blumenberg founds the modern age's claim to legitimacy. Schmitt is shown to argue against what he perceived to be a human plan to terminate history in an earthly utopia, precluding a divine judgment on history and man. The subsequent debate between Blumenberg and Schmitt in letters and texts reveals fundamental differences concerning the status of man with regard to the absolute, with Schmitt's concept of antagonistic, absolute potencies being pitched against Blumenberg's vision of a division of powers, which he discusses in terms of the myth of Prometheus. In arguing for the autonomy of the modern age, Blumenberg is shown to challenge critiques of civilization which avail themselves of religious rhetoric for political ends.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a History, European. $3 1018076
650 4 $a Literature, Germanic. $3 1019072
650 4 $a Religion, Philosophy of. $3 1017774
690 $a 0335
690 $a 0311
690 $a 0322
710 2 $a Princeton University. $3 645579
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-07A.
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3414164