東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A M...

Brady, Gilbert P.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A Multi-site Case Study Examining the Dynamic Interplay between Institutional Logics of Action and Participatory Managerial Sensemaking Processes of Two Successful Managing Partner Teams in a Large Insurance Firm.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A Multi-site Case Study Examining the Dynamic Interplay between Institutional Logics of Action and Participatory Managerial Sensemaking Processes of Two Successful Managing Partner Teams in a Large Insurance Firm./
作者:	Brady, Gilbert P.
面頁冊數:	222 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-07A(E).
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3557488
ISBN:	9781303006203

Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A Multi-site Case Study Examining the Dynamic Interplay between Institutional Logics of Action and Participatory Managerial Sensemaking Processes of Two Successful Managing Partner Teams in a Large Insurance Firm.
Brady, Gilbert P.

Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A Multi-site Case Study Examining the Dynamic Interplay between Institutional Logics of Action and Participatory Managerial Sensemaking Processes of Two Successful Managing Partner Teams in a Large Insurance Firm. - 222 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2013.

This study explored the dynamic relationship between institutional logics of action (Thornton et al. 2012; DiMaggio, 1997) and the participatory managerial sensemaking (Weick, 2009; De Jaegher & DiPaolo, 2007) processes of two successful Managing Partner teams in a large insurance firm. To best understand how this relationship emerges, a multi-site case study methodology was employed. Data was collected over a four month time period that coincided with the CEO publically expressing a strategic initiative to distribute leadership. Combining document review, observation, focus groups, and informal interviews, data was collected in three phases intended to mirror the phenomenological interview process (Seidman, 2006) and followed a sequence of description, analysis, and interpretation (Corbin & Strauss, 1990).

ISBN: 9781303006203Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A Multi-site Case Study Examining the Dynamic Interplay between Institutional Logics of Action and Participatory Managerial Sensemaking Processes of Two Successful Managing Partner Teams in a Large Insurance Firm.
LDR:02934nam a2200301 4500 001 1959840
005 20140520124925.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303006203
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3557488
035 $a AAI3557488
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Brady, Gilbert P. $3 2095376
245 1 0 $a Enacting Managerial Sensemaking: A Multi-site Case Study Examining the Dynamic Interplay between Institutional Logics of Action and Participatory Managerial Sensemaking Processes of Two Successful Managing Partner Teams in a Large Insurance Firm.
300 $a 222 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Margaret Gorman Kirchoff.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2013.
520 $a This study explored the dynamic relationship between institutional logics of action (Thornton et al. 2012; DiMaggio, 1997) and the participatory managerial sensemaking (Weick, 2009; De Jaegher & DiPaolo, 2007) processes of two successful Managing Partner teams in a large insurance firm. To best understand how this relationship emerges, a multi-site case study methodology was employed. Data was collected over a four month time period that coincided with the CEO publically expressing a strategic initiative to distribute leadership. Combining document review, observation, focus groups, and informal interviews, data was collected in three phases intended to mirror the phenomenological interview process (Seidman, 2006) and followed a sequence of description, analysis, and interpretation (Corbin & Strauss, 1990).
520 $a The findings revealed five noteworthy conclusions. First, colliding or competing institutional logics serve as a trigger for sensemaking. Second, an emerging collective comfort with doubt results from a hyper-interactive environment that fosters mutual curiosity in regards to both successes and failures. Third, an increased comfort with doubt allows for more mindful participatory managerial sensemaking. These two sites prioritized the institutional logics of community, profession, and corporation in varied ways, yet both were able to do so based on the present context they were facing and as a result foster greater reliability. Fourth, institutional logics of action representing relationships, structure and agency can serve to maintain the mutual incorporation of two agents, allowing for extended participatory sensemaking. Finally, understanding institutional logics as a cultural expression, in dialogue with participatory managerial sensemaking processes, enhances the institutionalizing of mindfulness.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a Sociology, Organization Theory. $3 1669248
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0635
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Education and Human Development. $3 1018508
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-07A(E).
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3557488