東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Relative performance of banking and ...

Carlsen, Steven W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Relative performance of banking and insurance through the financial crisis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Relative performance of banking and insurance through the financial crisis./
作者:	Carlsen, Steven W.
面頁冊數:	183 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-11A(E).
標題:	Economics, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3588206
ISBN:	9781303261626

Relative performance of banking and insurance through the financial crisis.
Carlsen, Steven W.

Relative performance of banking and insurance through the financial crisis. - 183 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fordham University, 2013.

Within the financial services sector of the U.S. economy, commercial banking and insurance have broadly similar operating models, are subject to similar regulatory scrutiny and, over the last 20 years, have gone through a period of consolidation. Not surprisingly, the two industries experienced virtually identical average failure rates over the 35 years prior to the financial crisis of 2008. While elements of the profitability of both industries are pro-cyclical, their failure rates have not tended to be associated with broad economic cycles. Despite these historic similarities, the two performed very differently in the financial crisis, with large banks requiring extraordinary efforts by multiple agencies within the federal government to avoid failure. We identify 12 main reasons for this divergence, loosely arranged into four categories: financial, incentive structures, behavioral and regulatory. Our analysis leads to three main hypotheses: I. Regulatory capture played a key role in positioning the commercial banks for a crisis. II. For the largest commercial banks, the banking model has changed, creating risks and exposures inadequately addressed by current regulatory and accounting regimes. III. The fractured nature of the regulatory environment created gaps in responsibility and accountability, decreasing the effectiveness of regulations and regulators in both industries.

ISBN: 9781303261626Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017424
Economics, General.

Relative performance of banking and insurance through the financial crisis.
LDR:02592nam a2200313 4500 001 1959527
005 20140520124323.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303261626
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3588206
035 $a AAI3588206
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carlsen, Steven W. $3 2094975
245 1 0 $a Relative performance of banking and insurance through the financial crisis.
300 $a 183 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Duncan James.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fordham University, 2013.
520 $a Within the financial services sector of the U.S. economy, commercial banking and insurance have broadly similar operating models, are subject to similar regulatory scrutiny and, over the last 20 years, have gone through a period of consolidation. Not surprisingly, the two industries experienced virtually identical average failure rates over the 35 years prior to the financial crisis of 2008. While elements of the profitability of both industries are pro-cyclical, their failure rates have not tended to be associated with broad economic cycles. Despite these historic similarities, the two performed very differently in the financial crisis, with large banks requiring extraordinary efforts by multiple agencies within the federal government to avoid failure. We identify 12 main reasons for this divergence, loosely arranged into four categories: financial, incentive structures, behavioral and regulatory. Our analysis leads to three main hypotheses: I. Regulatory capture played a key role in positioning the commercial banks for a crisis. II. For the largest commercial banks, the banking model has changed, creating risks and exposures inadequately addressed by current regulatory and accounting regimes. III. The fractured nature of the regulatory environment created gaps in responsibility and accountability, decreasing the effectiveness of regulations and regulators in both industries.
520 $a We also explore post-crisis developments, including some of the strengths and weaknesses of The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Finally, we offer a series of recommendations designed to curtail future crises in these vital industries.
590 $a School code: 0072.
650 4 $a Economics, General. $3 1017424
650 4 $a Economics, Commerce-Business. $3 626649
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
650 4 $a Business Administration, Banking. $3 1018458
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0505
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0770
710 2 $a Fordham University. $b Economics. $3 2094976
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-11A(E).
790 $a 0072
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3588206