東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring the Relationship between P...

Guder, Christopher S.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, and Satisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+RTM Results.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, and Satisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+RTM Results./
作者:	Guder, Christopher S.
面頁冊數:	156 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-06A(E).
標題:	Library Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3553955
ISBN:	9781267937186

Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, and Satisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+RTM Results.
Guder, Christopher S.

Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, and Satisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+RTM Results. - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Ohio University, 2012.

The purpose of this study was to explore how faculty and students responded to the Information Control section of the LibQUAL+RTM survey at two libraries with different Carnegie Classifications. As one of the institutions being studied was considering a shift from a research institution to one more focused on teaching and learning, this study used two schools with different Carnegie Classifications, one with a RU_H and the other with a Master's M classification, to determine if faculty and students had different minimum, perceived, and desired scores related to Information Control.

ISBN: 9781267937186Subjects--Topical Terms:

881164
Library Science.

Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, and Satisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+RTM Results.
LDR:02804nam a2200313 4500 001 1958700
005 20140426114412.5
008 150210s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267937186
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3553955
035 $a AAI3553955
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Guder, Christopher S. $3 2093858
245 1 0 $a Exploring the Relationship between Patron Type, Carnegie Classification, and Satisfaction with Library Services: An Analysis of LibQUAL+RTM Results.
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Teresa J. Franklin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Ohio University, 2012.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explore how faculty and students responded to the Information Control section of the LibQUAL+RTM survey at two libraries with different Carnegie Classifications. As one of the institutions being studied was considering a shift from a research institution to one more focused on teaching and learning, this study used two schools with different Carnegie Classifications, one with a RU_H and the other with a Master's M classification, to determine if faculty and students had different minimum, perceived, and desired scores related to Information Control.
520 $a A three way between-within subjects ANOVA was used as a method of analysis, with two between-subjects variables and one within-subjects variable. The first between-subjects variable was patron type, and consisted of undergraduate students, graduate students, and faculty members. The second between-within subjects variable was Carnegie Classification and consisted of RU_H or Master's M classification. The within-subjects variable has three levels that serve as three dependent variables. Each dependent variable is a composite or the mean score for the combined eight questions that make up the Information Control component of LibQUAL+RTM. The Information Control component deals with collections and the access provided to those collections. Because each question in the survey has a corresponding 9 point Likert scale for minimum, perceived, and desired service quality, three separate means were created for each respondent.
520 $a The results of the analysis indicate that Carnegie Classification has no significant effect on how students and faculty respond to minimum, perceived, and desired levels of service with regard to Information Control. There were significant differences with regard to patron level responses.
590 $a School code: 0167.
650 4 $a Library Science. $3 881164
650 4 $a Information Science. $3 1017528
650 4 $a Education, Technology of. $3 1018012
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a Ohio University. $b Department of Educational Studies. $3 1675405
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-06A(E).
790 $a 0167
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3553955