東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The political economy of implementat...

Pang, Hong.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The political economy of implementation: Intellectual property rights protection across the world.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The political economy of implementation: Intellectual property rights protection across the world./
作者:	Pang, Hong.
面頁冊數:	311 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1546.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International73-04A.
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3487940
ISBN:	9781267076526

The political economy of implementation: Intellectual property rights protection across the world.
Pang, Hong.

The political economy of implementation: Intellectual property rights protection across the world. - 311 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1546.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2011.

This dissertation studies the reasons and mechanisms of domestic compliance and implementation of international commitments in one of the trade-related issue areas, intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, by examining both international influences and domestic characteristics, analyzing variations at both national and industrial level, comparing the reasons for both IPR statutory protection and enforcement, and using both statistical analysis and comparative case study.

ISBN: 9781267076526Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

The political economy of implementation: Intellectual property rights protection across the world.
LDR:06252nam a2200361 4500 001 1958589
005 20140426115048.5
008 150210s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267076526
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3487940
035 $a AAI3487940
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Pang, Hong. $3 2093720
245 1 4 $a The political economy of implementation: Intellectual property rights protection across the world.
300 $a 311 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 73-04, Section: A, page: 1546.
500 $a Adviser: John S. Odell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2011.
520 $a This dissertation studies the reasons and mechanisms of domestic compliance and implementation of international commitments in one of the trade-related issue areas, intellectual property rights (IPR) protection, by examining both international influences and domestic characteristics, analyzing variations at both national and industrial level, comparing the reasons for both IPR statutory protection and enforcement, and using both statistical analysis and comparative case study.
520 $a First, this dissertation breaks new ground by establishing the importance of domestic legal institutions for differences in IPR protection, especially in terms of enforcement on the ground. Countries depend on the currently existing legal institutions to enact provisions and develop new rules for IPR protection according to the new needs of technology advancement, economic development and industrial restructuring as well as to provide the primary enforcement apparatus and deference to potential infringements. I find that countries of Common Law, which are characterized with legal infrastructure friendlier to property rights, more independent judicial power and stronger capability to adapt to the changing social circumstances, provide higher level of IPR enforcement than countries of German Civil Law, Scandinavian Civil law and French Civil Law, although the differences among countries of different legal families in statutory protection are not so obvious in the best available longitudinal data.
520 $a Second, this dissertation examines the effects of domestic political regime on both IPR statutory protection and enforcement. It finds that the interests of intellectual property generators and owners are more likely to be protected on the books in democratic regimes than in authoritarian regimes, although in practice there is no obvious difference in IPR enforcement results between the two country groups. More importantly, this dissertation discovers that authoritarian regimes are more likely to yield to international pressures propelling them to enact higher level of IPR protection than their democratic counterparts, given that they do not need to get international commitments approved by costly and prolonged domestic political debates and there is no domestic democratic procedure as a leverage against international pressures for legislation and policy change.
520 $a Third, on the international side of the story, this dissertation takes initiative to systematically examine the effects of the TRIPS Agreement embedded in the world trade regime with strengthened dispute settlement mechanism on both IPR statutory protection and enforcement. A survey of patent-related cases brought in front of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) reveals that they have effectively propelled defendants to enact patent protection on the book, unless the defendants are the United States or the European Community. A similar pattern was also found in statutory protection for copyright. However, given that the TRIPS Agreement does not specify any standard for enforcement results, the WTO dispute settlement mechanism has been feeble to depress software piracy rate across the globe in a short term.
520 $a Furthermore, this dissertation makes the first effort to examine the effects of regional trade agreements (RTAs) on IPR enforcement. I take initiative to survey the original texts of all the currently existing RTAs and their IPR provisions, identify several important distinguishing characteristics, categorize these agreements accordingly, and develop a dataset of countries' membership in RTAs of different kinds over time. This newly developed dataset helps us to extend our examination of international institutions and their effects on IPR protection to regional ones. It finds that, with other factors equal, countries involving into RTAs with provisions on copyright protection generally have lower software piracy rate and better copyright protection on the ground than those enjoying liberty without extra institutional constraints coming from RTAs.
520 $a Fourth, this dissertation illustrates the significance of making comparison at the industry level with a comparative case study of copyright protection in three industries in China. It challenges our entrenched assumption that certain type of IPR would be protected and enforced to the same extent for different sectors and their products once the basic principles and standards for the protection for this type of IPR have been enacted. It also challenges the overwhelming use of nations as the basic unit of analysis in the past. By virtue of this carefully designed comparative case study, I show how the domestic incentives for IPR protection are constructed both by government and by industries and emphasize the role of economic characteristics of industries in influencing the pattern of enterprise lobbying efforts and their effectiveness, inviting government support to certain industries, and contributing to variations in IPR protection across different industries.
520 $a Finally, by putting together three empirical studies, this dissertation illustrates the different reasons and mechanisms behind IPR statutory protection and IPR enforcement. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a Intellectual Property. $3 782112
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a University of Southern California. $b International Relations. $3 1034012
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 73-04A.
790 $a 0208
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3487940