東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The development and testing of a soc...

Smith, Kahsi Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The development and testing of a social cognitive model of commitment: A structural equation analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The development and testing of a social cognitive model of commitment: A structural equation analysis./
作者:	Smith, Kahsi Ann.
面頁冊數:	174 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: B, page: 7243.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International70-11B.
標題:	Psychology, Developmental. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3381595
ISBN:	9781109450651

The development and testing of a social cognitive model of commitment: A structural equation analysis.
Smith, Kahsi Ann.

The development and testing of a social cognitive model of commitment: A structural equation analysis. - 174 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: B, page: 7243.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2009.

This study employed structural equation analysis (SEM) to examine the following individual and dyadic models among a sample of 295 heterosexual dating couples: (1) social cognitive model of commitment, (2) Rusbult''s investment model of commitment, (3) combined commitment model. SEM analyses revealed social cognitive indicators including, self-talk, conflict management, and communicative efficacy were significant and positive predictors of commitment level for both females and males. Communicative efficacy was also found to mediate the relationship between conflict management and commitment for females and partially mediate this relationship among males. Results from the Rusbult investment model were consistent with previous research which revealed satisfaction level and investment size as significant and positive predictors of commitment and quality of alternatives as a significant and negative predictor of commitment. Significant partner effects were found in the social cognitive model between, (1) female conflict management and male communicative efficacy, (2) male conflict management and female communicative efficacy, (3) female communicative efficacy and male commitment, (4) male communicative efficacy and female commitment, and (5) female conflict management and male commitment. A negative partner effect was also found in the Rusbult investment model between female quality of alternatives and male commitment. Findings from this dissertation highlight the importance of the development and testing of alternative models of commitment among both members of a dyad.

ISBN: 9781109450651Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017557
Psychology, Developmental.

The development and testing of a social cognitive model of commitment: A structural equation analysis.
LDR:02535nam 2200301 4500 001 1957958
005 20140214104439.5
008 150212s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109450651
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3381595
035 $a AAI3381595
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Smith, Kahsi Ann. $3 2092913
245 1 4 $a The development and testing of a social cognitive model of commitment: A structural equation analysis.
300 $a 174 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 70-11, Section: B, page: 7243.
500 $a Adviser: D. Bruce Carter.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2009.
520 $a This study employed structural equation analysis (SEM) to examine the following individual and dyadic models among a sample of 295 heterosexual dating couples: (1) social cognitive model of commitment, (2) Rusbult''s investment model of commitment, (3) combined commitment model. SEM analyses revealed social cognitive indicators including, self-talk, conflict management, and communicative efficacy were significant and positive predictors of commitment level for both females and males. Communicative efficacy was also found to mediate the relationship between conflict management and commitment for females and partially mediate this relationship among males. Results from the Rusbult investment model were consistent with previous research which revealed satisfaction level and investment size as significant and positive predictors of commitment and quality of alternatives as a significant and negative predictor of commitment. Significant partner effects were found in the social cognitive model between, (1) female conflict management and male communicative efficacy, (2) male conflict management and female communicative efficacy, (3) female communicative efficacy and male commitment, (4) male communicative efficacy and female commitment, and (5) female conflict management and male commitment. A negative partner effect was also found in the Rusbult investment model between female quality of alternatives and male commitment. Findings from this dissertation highlight the importance of the development and testing of alternative models of commitment among both members of a dyad.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Psychology, Developmental. $3 1017557
650 4 $a Sociology, Individual and Family Studies. $3 626655
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0628
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a Syracuse University. $3 1017440
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 70-11B.
790 $a 0659
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3381595