東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Faculty Beliefs and Practices About ...

Kreiger, Joan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Faculty Beliefs and Practices About Writing Initiatives as Classroom Strategies and Institutional Objectives.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Faculty Beliefs and Practices About Writing Initiatives as Classroom Strategies and Institutional Objectives./
作者:	Kreiger, Joan.
面頁冊數:	136 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-08A(E).
標題:	Education, Language and Literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3560619
ISBN:	9781303068607

Faculty Beliefs and Practices About Writing Initiatives as Classroom Strategies and Institutional Objectives.
Kreiger, Joan.

Faculty Beliefs and Practices About Writing Initiatives as Classroom Strategies and Institutional Objectives. - 136 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Johnson & Wales University, 2013.

Employers consistently rank “writing skills” as a desired quality of college graduates; however studies show that students’ writing skills often fall short of the mark (AAC& U, 2008; Charting the Future, 2006). Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) initiatives are one way universities attempt to improve student writing and promote student learning outcomes (Fulwiler, 1984; McLeod & Shirley, 1988). Linkages between critical thinking and writing are well documented, as examples of ways to promote general cognitive and intellectual growth (Bean, 2003; Britton, 1972; Chaffee, McMahon, & Stout, 2008; Fulwiler, 1982). Additionally, WAC programs have varied ties to general education goals and institutional-level assessment, including those noted in regional accreditation standards for writing.

ISBN: 9781303068607Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018115
Education, Language and Literature.

Faculty Beliefs and Practices About Writing Initiatives as Classroom Strategies and Institutional Objectives.
LDR:03765nam 2200397 4500 001 1957579
005 20140106101307.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303068607
035 $a (UMI)AAI3560619
035 $a AAI3560619
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Kreiger, Joan. $3 2092517
245 1 0 $a Faculty Beliefs and Practices About Writing Initiatives as Classroom Strategies and Institutional Objectives.
300 $a 136 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Stacy Kite; Ralph Jasparro; Marilyn Davis; James Griffin.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Johnson & Wales University, 2013.
520 $a Employers consistently rank “writing skills” as a desired quality of college graduates; however studies show that students’ writing skills often fall short of the mark (AAC& U, 2008; Charting the Future, 2006). Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) initiatives are one way universities attempt to improve student writing and promote student learning outcomes (Fulwiler, 1984; McLeod & Shirley, 1988). Linkages between critical thinking and writing are well documented, as examples of ways to promote general cognitive and intellectual growth (Bean, 2003; Britton, 1972; Chaffee, McMahon, & Stout, 2008; Fulwiler, 1982). Additionally, WAC programs have varied ties to general education goals and institutional-level assessment, including those noted in regional accreditation standards for writing.
520 $a The purpose of this quantitative, descriptive study was to examine whether the factors of attendance at WAC training, academic discipline, and/or years of teaching experience reveal any differences in the three dimensions of critical thinking, writing strategies utilization, and writing strategies beliefs, or relate to faculty beliefs and practices of WAC initiatives and other writing strategies in an effort to promote student learning outcomes, as well as institutional mission of continuous improvement.
520 $a This study utilized a questionnaire to examine the differences in beliefs and practices toward writing strategies among faculty (N=171) at a mid-size private institution to provide insights related to the following research questions: How do faculty members differ with respect to dimensions of critical thinking, writing strategies utilization, and writing strategies beliefs, when sorted by faculty with WAC training experience and faculty without WAC training experience; when sorted by academic affiliation, and; when sorted by years of teaching experience?
520 $a Is there a statistically significant difference in faculty perspective of a link between WAC initiatives and institutional goals, among faculty with WAC training experience and faculty without WAC training experience? No significant differences were noted on the t-tests between faculty who attended the training and those that did not, however faculty who attended the training were more likely to see WAC initiatives as aligned with institutional mission and outcomes. Findings also indicate that faculty members see strong links between critical thinking and writing.
590 $a School code: 1346.
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Education, Pedagogy. $3 1669025
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Johnson & Wales University. $b Education. $3 1022587
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-08A(E).
790 1 0 $a Kite, Stacy, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Jasparro, Ralph, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Davis, Marilyn, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Griffin, James, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Jasparro, Ralph $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Davis, Marilyn $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Griffin, James $e committee member
790 $a 1346
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2013
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3560619