東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Technical Performance Measurement an...

Eggstaff, Justin William.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Technical Performance Measurement and Technical Risk Analysis Utilizing the Assessment of Probability Distributions From Expert Judgment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Technical Performance Measurement and Technical Risk Analysis Utilizing the Assessment of Probability Distributions From Expert Judgment./
作者:	Eggstaff, Justin William.
面頁冊數:	253 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-07B(E).
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3557460
ISBN:	9781303005848

Technical Performance Measurement and Technical Risk Analysis Utilizing the Assessment of Probability Distributions From Expert Judgment.
Eggstaff, Justin William.

Technical Performance Measurement and Technical Risk Analysis Utilizing the Assessment of Probability Distributions From Expert Judgment. - 253 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2013.

Systems engineers are routinely tasked with facilitating the delicate balance between cost, schedule, and technical performance in the acquisition of new technology. While techniques for assessing cost and schedule performance abound, the estimation and risk analysis of technical performance in development programs currently rely on the unstructured opinions of experts because the identification and application of relevant quantitative data for constructive modeling is not practical. This research proposes a methodology that combines existing procedures for technical performance measurement with Cooke's Classical Model, a method for mathematically aggregating structured expert judgment, and Garvey and Cho's TPM Risk Index, a method that normalizes technical performance measures referenced to its desired level of performance, to develop predictive progress plans for technical performance estimation and risk analysis. Cooke's Classical Model has been widely used in risk analysis for over 20 years; however, the model's validity has been the subject of much debate. This study conducts a comprehensive examination of the model through an iterative, cross-validation test to perform an out-of-sample comparison between the Classical Model and the equal-weight linear opinion pool; followed by a case study to demonstrate the proposed methodology using actual data from a Department of Defense acquisition program. The results indicate that Cooke's classical model significantly outperforms equally weighted expert judgment and that the proposed methodology is suitable for developing predictive technical performance and risk progress plans for systems engineers.

ISBN: 9781303005848Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

Technical Performance Measurement and Technical Risk Analysis Utilizing the Assessment of Probability Distributions From Expert Judgment.
LDR:02868nam 2200337 4500 001 1957356
005 20131202131342.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303005848
035 $a (UMI)AAI3557460
035 $a AAI3557460
040 $a UMI $c UMI
100 1 $a Eggstaff, Justin William. $3 2092238
245 1 0 $a Technical Performance Measurement and Technical Risk Analysis Utilizing the Assessment of Probability Distributions From Expert Judgment.
300 $a 253 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Thomas A. Mazzuchi; Shahram Sarkani.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2013.
520 $a Systems engineers are routinely tasked with facilitating the delicate balance between cost, schedule, and technical performance in the acquisition of new technology. While techniques for assessing cost and schedule performance abound, the estimation and risk analysis of technical performance in development programs currently rely on the unstructured opinions of experts because the identification and application of relevant quantitative data for constructive modeling is not practical. This research proposes a methodology that combines existing procedures for technical performance measurement with Cooke's Classical Model, a method for mathematically aggregating structured expert judgment, and Garvey and Cho's TPM Risk Index, a method that normalizes technical performance measures referenced to its desired level of performance, to develop predictive progress plans for technical performance estimation and risk analysis. Cooke's Classical Model has been widely used in risk analysis for over 20 years; however, the model's validity has been the subject of much debate. This study conducts a comprehensive examination of the model through an iterative, cross-validation test to perform an out-of-sample comparison between the Classical Model and the equal-weight linear opinion pool; followed by a case study to demonstrate the proposed methodology using actual data from a Department of Defense acquisition program. The results indicate that Cooke's classical model significantly outperforms equally weighted expert judgment and that the proposed methodology is suitable for developing predictive technical performance and risk progress plans for systems engineers.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Statistics. $3 517247
650 4 $a Engineering, General. $3 1020744
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0463
690 $a 0537
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b School of Engineering and Applied Science. $3 1020851
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-07B(E).
790 1 0 $a Mazzuchi, Thomas A., $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Sarkani, Shahram, $e advisor
790 1 0 $a Murphree, E. Lile, Jr. $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Wasek, James $e committee member
790 1 0 $a Eftekari, Reza $e committee member
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3557460