東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Choosing your battles = American civ...

Feaver, Peter.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Choosing your battles = American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Choosing your battles/ by the authors Peter D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi.
其他題名:	American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
作者:	Feaver, Peter.
其他作者:	Gelpi, Christopher,
出版者:	Princeton :Princeton University Press, : 2005.,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (xiii, 250 p.)
內容註:	The civil-military opinion gap over the use of force -- The impact of elite veterans on American decisions to use force -- Casualty sensitivity and civil-military relations -- Exploring the determination of casualty sensitivity.
標題:	Civil-military relations - United States. -
電子資源:	http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sfk2
ISBN:	9781400841455 (electronic bk.)

Choosing your battles = American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
Feaver, Peter.

Choosing your battlesAmerican civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /[electronic resource] :by the authors Peter D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi. - Princeton :Princeton University Press,2005. - 1 online resource (xiii, 250 p.)

Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-228) and indexes.

The civil-military opinion gap over the use of force -- The impact of elite veterans on American decisions to use force -- Casualty sensitivity and civil-military relations -- Exploring the determination of casualty sensitivity.

America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feav.

ISBN: 9781400841455 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:

874355
Civil-military relations
--United States.

LC Class. No.: JK330 / .F434 2011

Dewey Class. No.: 322.50973

Choosing your battles = American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword /
LDR:01927cmm a2200301Ka 4500 001 1956231
003 OCoLC
005 20141031030036.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 150126s2005 nju ob 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9781400841455 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 1400841453 (electronic bk.)
020 $z 0691124272
020 $z 9780691124278
035 $a (OCoLC)759398156 $z (OCoLC)833583040
035 $a ocn759398156
040 $a N $b eng $e pn $c N $d EBLCP $d E7B $d REDDC $d OCLCQ $d MHW $d JSTOR $d OCLCF $d DEBSZ $d HEBIS $d OCLCO $d OCLCQ
043 $a n-us---
050 4 $a JK330 $b .F434 2011
082 0 4 $a 322.50973 $2 22
100 1 $a Feaver, Peter. $3 953801
245 1 0 $a Choosing your battles $h [electronic resource] : $b American civil-military relations and the use of force ; with a new afterword / $c by the authors Peter D. Feaver and Christopher Gelpi.
260 $a Princeton : $b Princeton University Press, $c 2005.
300 $a 1 online resource (xiii, 250 p.)
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. 215-228) and indexes.
505 0 $a The civil-military opinion gap over the use of force -- The impact of elite veterans on American decisions to use force -- Casualty sensitivity and civil-military relations -- Exploring the determination of casualty sensitivity.
520 $a America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feav.
588 0 $a Print version record.
650 0 $a Civil-military relations $z United States. $3 874355
650 0 $a War and emergency powers $z United States. $3 902076
700 1 $a Gelpi, Christopher, $d 1966- $3 2089972
856 4 0 $u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sfk2