語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Epistemic relativism : = a construct...
~
Seidel, Markus,
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Epistemic relativism : = a constructive critique /
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Epistemic relativism :/ Markus Seidel.
其他題名:
a constructive critique /
作者:
Seidel, Markus,
面頁冊數:
1 online resource.
內容註:
Setting the stage: Epistemic Relativism in the Strong Programme and Beyond -- Realism and the Argument from Underdetermination -- Norm-circularity -- Epistemic Absolutism that Explains the Relativist's Intuition -- Summary and Outlook.
標題:
Science - Philosophy. -
電子資源:
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137377890
ISBN:
1137377895 (electronic bk.)
Epistemic relativism : = a constructive critique /
Seidel, Markus,
Epistemic relativism :
a constructive critique /Markus Seidel. - 1 online resource.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Setting the stage: Epistemic Relativism in the Strong Programme and Beyond -- Realism and the Argument from Underdetermination -- Norm-circularity -- Epistemic Absolutism that Explains the Relativist's Intuition -- Summary and Outlook.
Are our beliefs justified only relatively to a specific culture or society? Is it possible to give reasons for the superiority of our scientific, epistemic methods? Markus Seidel sets out to answer these questions in his critique of epistemic relativism. Focusing on the work of the most prominent, explicitly relativist position in the sociology of scientific knowledge -- so-called 'Edinburgh relativism' or the 'Strong Programme', he scrutinizes the key arguments for epistemic relativism from a philosophical perspective: underdetermination and norm-circularity. His main negative result is that these arguments fall short of establishing epistemic relativism. Despite arguing for epistemic absolutism, Seidel aims to provide an account of non-relative justification that nevertheless integrates the basic, correct intuition of the epistemic relativist. His main positive result is that the epistemic absolutist can very well accept the idea that people using different standards of justification can be equally justified in holding their beliefs: Rational disagreement, he maintains, is perfectly possible. The book provides a detailed critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge and beyond. With its constructive part it aims at making conciliatory steps in a highly embittered discussion between sociology and philosophy of science.
ISBN: 1137377895 (electronic bk.)
Source: 702668Palgrave Macmillanhttp://www.palgraveconnect.com
Nat. Bib. Agency Control No.: 016684941UkSubjects--Topical Terms:
523660
Science
--Philosophy.Index Terms--Genre/Form:
542853
Electronic books.
LC Class. No.: BD221
Dewey Class. No.: 115
Epistemic relativism : = a constructive critique /
LDR
:02748cmm a2200349Ki 4500
001
1950565
003
OCoLC
005
20140910115812.0
006
m o d
007
cr cnu---unuuu
008
231227s2014 enk ob 001 0 eng d
016
7
$a
016684941
$2
Uk
020
$a
1137377895 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
9781137377890 (electronic bk.)
035
$a
(OCoLC)875406073
035
$a
ocn875406073
035
$a
1950565
037
$a
702668
$b
Palgrave Macmillan
$n
http://www.palgraveconnect.com
040
$a
UKPGM
$b
eng
$e
rda
$e
pn
$c
UKPGM
$d
UKMGB
$d
YDXCP
$d
CDX
$d
IDEBK
$d
OCLCF
049
$a
TEFA
050
4
$a
BD221
082
0 4
$a
115
$2
23
100
1
$a
Seidel, Markus,
$e
author.
$3
3648897
245
1 0
$a
Epistemic relativism :
$b
a constructive critique /
$c
Markus Seidel.
264
1
$a
[Basingstoke] :
$b
Palgrave Macmillan,
$c
2014.
300
$a
1 online resource.
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references and index.
505
0
$a
Setting the stage: Epistemic Relativism in the Strong Programme and Beyond -- Realism and the Argument from Underdetermination -- Norm-circularity -- Epistemic Absolutism that Explains the Relativist's Intuition -- Summary and Outlook.
520
$a
Are our beliefs justified only relatively to a specific culture or society? Is it possible to give reasons for the superiority of our scientific, epistemic methods? Markus Seidel sets out to answer these questions in his critique of epistemic relativism. Focusing on the work of the most prominent, explicitly relativist position in the sociology of scientific knowledge -- so-called 'Edinburgh relativism' or the 'Strong Programme', he scrutinizes the key arguments for epistemic relativism from a philosophical perspective: underdetermination and norm-circularity. His main negative result is that these arguments fall short of establishing epistemic relativism. Despite arguing for epistemic absolutism, Seidel aims to provide an account of non-relative justification that nevertheless integrates the basic, correct intuition of the epistemic relativist. His main positive result is that the epistemic absolutist can very well accept the idea that people using different standards of justification can be equally justified in holding their beliefs: Rational disagreement, he maintains, is perfectly possible. The book provides a detailed critique of relativism in the sociology of scientific knowledge and beyond. With its constructive part it aims at making conciliatory steps in a highly embittered discussion between sociology and philosophy of science.
588
$a
Description based on publisher supplied information; title not viewed.
650
0
$a
Science
$x
Philosophy.
$3
523660
650
0
$a
Knowledge, Theory of.
$3
523921
650
0
$a
Relativity.
$3
519452
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
lcsh
$3
542853
710
2
$a
Palgrave Connect (Online service)
$3
1081578
856
4 0
$3
Palgrave Connect
$u
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137377890
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9248151
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB BD221
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入