東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Synthesizing evidence from narrative...

Jordan, Zoe.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion/ Zoe Jordan, Rie Konno, Pei Fan Mu.
作者:	Jordan, Zoe.
其他作者:	Konno, Rie.
出版者:	Philadelphia, Pa. :Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, : 2011.,
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (63 p.)
內容註:	Narrative, opinion and text as evidence: Knowledge, evidence and wisdom in clinical decision making ; Evidence-informed clinical wisdom ; Narrative, expert opinion and text as sources of evidence -- The systematic review of narrative, expert opinion and text: Protocol development ; Searching for the evidence ; Appraising the evidence ; Synthesizing the evidence.
標題:	Evidence. -
電子資源:	http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=booktext&D=books&AN=01607888/1st_Edition&XPATH=/PG(0)

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion
Jordan, Zoe.

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion[electronic resource] /Zoe Jordan, Rie Konno, Pei Fan Mu. - 1st ed. - Philadelphia, Pa. :Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2011. - 1 online resource (63 p.)

Includes bibliographical references.

Narrative, opinion and text as evidence: Knowledge, evidence and wisdom in clinical decision making ; Evidence-informed clinical wisdom ; Narrative, expert opinion and text as sources of evidence -- The systematic review of narrative, expert opinion and text: Protocol development ; Searching for the evidence ; Appraising the evidence ; Synthesizing the evidence.

While most health professionals have embraced the concept of evidence-informed clinical decision-making, it is true to say that clinical questions are not always answered by systematic reviews of research evidence. This book explores different sources of knowledge for clinical decision-making. It is frequently the case that knowledge from different sources may be applicable (and/or available) to inform a particular procedure or intervention. In the absence of evidence derived from rigorous primary research studies, what are the options? And once this knowledge is identified, how can clinicians feel confident about it reliability and validity before utilizing it in their practice?Subjects--Topical Terms:

583147
Evidence.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

542853
Electronic books.

LC Class. No.: BC173 / .J67 2011

Dewey Class. No.: 121/.65

National Library of Medicine Call No.: WB 102.5 / J825s 2011

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion
LDR:01928cmm a2200253M 4500 001 1901816
006 m o d
007 cr |||||||||||
008 140127s2011 pau ob 000 0 eng d
020 $z 1451163851
020 $z 9781451163858
035 $a ocn774694984
040 $a AEU $c UAB $d UWO $d OCLCO $d OCLCQ
050 4 $a BC173 $b .J67 2011
060 4 $a WB 102.5 $b J825s 2011
082 0 4 $a 121/.65
100 1 $a Jordan, Zoe. $3 2017487
245 1 0 $a Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion $h [electronic resource] / $c Zoe Jordan, Rie Konno, Pei Fan Mu.
250 $a 1st ed.
260 $a Philadelphia, Pa. : $b Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, $c 2011.
300 $a 1 online resource (63 p.)
504 $a Includes bibliographical references.
505 0 $a Narrative, opinion and text as evidence: Knowledge, evidence and wisdom in clinical decision making ; Evidence-informed clinical wisdom ; Narrative, expert opinion and text as sources of evidence -- The systematic review of narrative, expert opinion and text: Protocol development ; Searching for the evidence ; Appraising the evidence ; Synthesizing the evidence.
520 $a While most health professionals have embraced the concept of evidence-informed clinical decision-making, it is true to say that clinical questions are not always answered by systematic reviews of research evidence. This book explores different sources of knowledge for clinical decision-making. It is frequently the case that knowledge from different sources may be applicable (and/or available) to inform a particular procedure or intervention. In the absence of evidence derived from rigorous primary research studies, what are the options? And once this knowledge is identified, how can clinicians feel confident about it reliability and validity before utilizing it in their practice?
588 $a Description based on print version record.
650 0 $a Evidence. $3 583147
650 2 $a Decision Making. $3 617264
650 2 $a Evidence-Based Practice. $3 1074954
655 4 $a Electronic books. $2 lcsh $3 542853
700 1 $a Konno, Rie. $3 2017488
700 1 $a Mu, Pei Fan. $3 2017489
856 4 0 $u http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=booktext&D=books&AN=01607888/1st_Edition&XPATH=/PG(0)