東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

In defense of an anachronism: The C...

Heineman, Paul Edward.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

In defense of an anachronism: The Cossack question on the Don, 1861--1914 (Russia).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	In defense of an anachronism: The Cossack question on the Don, 1861--1914 (Russia)./
作者:	Heineman, Paul Edward.
面頁冊數:	374 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-07, Section: A, page: 2874.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International61-07A.
標題:	History, European. -
電子資源:	http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9978115
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9978115
ISBN:	0599839619

In defense of an anachronism: The Cossack question on the Don, 1861--1914 (Russia).
Heineman, Paul Edward.

In defense of an anachronism: The Cossack question on the Don, 1861--1914 (Russia). - 374 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-07, Section: A, page: 2874.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2000.

By the turn of the twentieth century, a consensus had formed across a broad spectrum of Russian society that the Cossacks, a martial estate that lived in quasi-segregation from the rest of the population, had become an anachronism. The dissertation examines the dynamics of this issue on the territory of the Don Host, the largest and oldest of the Cossack Hosts, where the local intelligentsia criticized state policies toward the Cossacks and offered a reform agenda to reverse negative economic and cultural trends.

ISBN: 0599839619Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018076
History, European.

In defense of an anachronism: The Cossack question on the Don, 1861--1914 (Russia).
LDR:03259nmm 2200325 4500 001 1866393
005 20050105135817.5
008 130614s2000 eng d
020 $a 0599839619
035 $a (UnM)AAI9978115
035 $a AAI9978115
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Heineman, Paul Edward. $3 1953779
245 1 0 $a In defense of an anachronism: The Cossack question on the Don, 1861--1914 (Russia).
300 $a 374 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-07, Section: A, page: 2874.
500 $a Mentor: Richard Stites.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2000.
520 $a By the turn of the twentieth century, a consensus had formed across a broad spectrum of Russian society that the Cossacks, a martial estate that lived in quasi-segregation from the rest of the population, had become an anachronism. The dissertation examines the dynamics of this issue on the territory of the Don Host, the largest and oldest of the Cossack Hosts, where the local intelligentsia criticized state policies toward the Cossacks and offered a reform agenda to reverse negative economic and cultural trends.
520 $a Chapter 1 studies the question of elite-formation on the Don, with an emphasis on the history of the Don nobility, whose members would emerge as the leading proponents of reform. Chapter 2 depicts life in late Imperial Novocherkassk, the institutional and cultural center of Don society. Chapter 3 investigates the basket of smaller issues which, taken in aggregate, comprised the "Cossack question": Don reformers endeavored to loosen the stifling grip of War Ministry bureaucrats on the local administration of the Don Host and to dilute the prevailing military ethos among the Cossacks.
520 $a Chapter 4 examines the spirited, if not always effectual, campaign of Don activists to commemorate the Don past; they organized archives, erected monuments, and, chiefly, wrote history. Chapter 5 describes how the narrative that emerged from their collective efforts established historical continuity between contemporary Cossacks and the Golden Age of Cossack liberty.
520 $a The Cossacks were becoming increasingly aware of rival groups, including ethnic Russians, as competitors. Chapter 6 examines how the Cossacks viewed the other social and ethnic groups populating the Don and analyzes how these impressions of "others" informed Cossack identity.
520 $a Traditional historiography on the Cossacks during the late Imperial period has focused predominately on their military and police functions. The dissertation invites a broader view of the Cossacks, one which allows for the existence of a literate, politically conscious level of Cossack society. Moreover, it demonstrates that the Don intelligentsia was formulating a modern identity for the Cossacks as an ethnic group with historical rights, rather than as an Imperial estate endowed with privileges.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a History, European. $3 1018076
690 $a 0335
710 2 0 $a Georgetown University. $3 1017582
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 61-07A.
790 1 0 $a Stites, Richard, $e advisor
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2000
856 $u http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9978115
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9978115