東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

When meritocracy prevails in higher ...

Lamar, Demetrius Alvino.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

When meritocracy prevails in higher education: An empirical study of American Black social mobility.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	When meritocracy prevails in higher education: An empirical study of American Black social mobility./
作者:	Lamar, Demetrius Alvino.
面頁冊數:	219 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-01, Section: A, page: 0309.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-01A.
標題:	Sociology, Social Structure and Development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3118162

When meritocracy prevails in higher education: An empirical study of American Black social mobility.
Lamar, Demetrius Alvino.

When meritocracy prevails in higher education: An empirical study of American Black social mobility. - 219 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-01, Section: A, page: 0309.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northeastern University, 2004.

Social stratification theorists have found selective colleges and universities to be invaluable institutions for the transmission of upward social mobility for mainstream America. However, minimal data exist to support this conclusion for Americans of color. Does graduating from a top college offer the same social and fiscal benefits to American blacks as it does for American whites? Using a combination of research methods, this study looked at a sample of American blacks who graduated from a leading liberal arts college between 1991 and 2000. A 23-item questionnaire was mailed to 91 American black college graduates provided by the alumni office. Thirty-eight responded to the mailed survey. In addition, follow-up, open ended, tape recorded, in depth interviews were conducted with 23 of the 38 survey respondents. The results showed that the American black middle class strongly favors, subscribes to, and takes advantage of selective post-secondary education. In sum, this social group valued their educational experience for its stability, competition, professionalism, and social diversity. One implication of these findings is that top colleges may fail to serve American blacks from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017425
Sociology, Social Structure and Development.

When meritocracy prevails in higher education: An empirical study of American Black social mobility.
LDR:02172nmm 2200301 4500 001 1863918
005 20041216104729.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3118162
035 $a AAI3118162
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lamar, Demetrius Alvino. $3 1951429
245 1 0 $a When meritocracy prevails in higher education: An empirical study of American Black social mobility.
300 $a 219 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-01, Section: A, page: 0309.
500 $a Chair: Robert L. Hall.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northeastern University, 2004.
520 $a Social stratification theorists have found selective colleges and universities to be invaluable institutions for the transmission of upward social mobility for mainstream America. However, minimal data exist to support this conclusion for Americans of color. Does graduating from a top college offer the same social and fiscal benefits to American blacks as it does for American whites? Using a combination of research methods, this study looked at a sample of American blacks who graduated from a leading liberal arts college between 1991 and 2000. A 23-item questionnaire was mailed to 91 American black college graduates provided by the alumni office. Thirty-eight responded to the mailed survey. In addition, follow-up, open ended, tape recorded, in depth interviews were conducted with 23 of the 38 survey respondents. The results showed that the American black middle class strongly favors, subscribes to, and takes advantage of selective post-secondary education. In sum, this social group valued their educational experience for its stability, competition, professionalism, and social diversity. One implication of these findings is that top colleges may fail to serve American blacks from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.
590 $a School code: 0160.
650 4 $a Sociology, Social Structure and Development. $3 1017425
650 4 $a Sociology, Ethnic and Racial Studies. $3 1017474
650 4 $a Black Studies. $3 1017673
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
690 $a 0700
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0325
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0745
710 2 0 $a Northeastern University. $3 1256818
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-01A.
790 1 0 $a Hall, Robert L., $e advisor
790 $a 0160
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3118162