東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Factory to farm, farm into factory: ...

Witkowski, Gregory R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Factory to farm, farm into factory: A case study of communist campaigns and agricultural collectivization in the German Democratic Republic.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Factory to farm, farm into factory: A case study of communist campaigns and agricultural collectivization in the German Democratic Republic./
作者:	Witkowski, Gregory R.
面頁冊數:	300 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1812.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-05A.
標題:	History, European. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3089169

Factory to farm, farm into factory: A case study of communist campaigns and agricultural collectivization in the German Democratic Republic.
Witkowski, Gregory R.

Factory to farm, farm into factory: A case study of communist campaigns and agricultural collectivization in the German Democratic Republic. - 300 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1812.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2003.

This work analyzes the communist use of concentrated mass mobilizations to implement an ambitious program of high modernist state planning. The East German dictatorship organized campaigns to overcome economic and political challenges and to launch new programs. I concentrate on the initiative started in 1953 under the slogan "Industrial Workers to the Countryside (Industriearbeiter aufs Land)." Over the next ten years, the campaign enlisted over 100,000 workers to serve in the countryside as farmhands, mechanics, directors of collectives, and in some cases mayors to impart class-consciousness in the established farmers and teach them new methods of production. Politburo leaders hoped this campaign would overcome political and economic deficiencies in rural areas by transforming agricultural production (through mechanization and rationalization) and societal structures (e.g. reorganizing village milieus). However, the goals of the regime were not always actualized on the local level as individuals acted in ways that alternately collided, coincided, and aligned with the program established by the central leadership. Ultimately, by pursuing their own goals, individuals at the grass roots changed the very nature of the campaign from one designed to usher in a systematic transformation of the countryside to one that brought about incremental improvements in agricultural production.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018076
History, European.

Factory to farm, farm into factory: A case study of communist campaigns and agricultural collectivization in the German Democratic Republic.
LDR:03398nmm 2200289 4500 001 1863629
005 20041215130321.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3089169
035 $a AAI3089169
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Witkowski, Gregory R. $3 1951145
245 1 0 $a Factory to farm, farm into factory: A case study of communist campaigns and agricultural collectivization in the German Democratic Republic.
300 $a 300 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1812.
500 $a Major Professor: Georg G. Iggers.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2003.
520 $a This work analyzes the communist use of concentrated mass mobilizations to implement an ambitious program of high modernist state planning. The East German dictatorship organized campaigns to overcome economic and political challenges and to launch new programs. I concentrate on the initiative started in 1953 under the slogan "Industrial Workers to the Countryside (Industriearbeiter aufs Land)." Over the next ten years, the campaign enlisted over 100,000 workers to serve in the countryside as farmhands, mechanics, directors of collectives, and in some cases mayors to impart class-consciousness in the established farmers and teach them new methods of production. Politburo leaders hoped this campaign would overcome political and economic deficiencies in rural areas by transforming agricultural production (through mechanization and rationalization) and societal structures (e.g. reorganizing village milieus). However, the goals of the regime were not always actualized on the local level as individuals acted in ways that alternately collided, coincided, and aligned with the program established by the central leadership. Ultimately, by pursuing their own goals, individuals at the grass roots changed the very nature of the campaign from one designed to usher in a systematic transformation of the countryside to one that brought about incremental improvements in agricultural production.
520 $a In my examination of this specific campaign in East Germany, I address three major historical themes: I delineate the limits of state power in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), investigate the communist attempt at modernization through state planning, and illustrate everyday experiences of those living under a communist regime. This campaign, an integral part of agricultural collectivization, is both a window into the functioning of the communist system and a point of fissure between expectations of the central authorities and reactions within the rural populace. It is especially useful as a case study of the complex and contradictory interaction of political power among central authorities, local administrators, and individual workers and peasants. The campaign was a qualified success and therefore illustrates both the basic internal deficiencies of the East German government that ultimately contributed to its own downfall as well as the accomplishments that kept it in power for forty years.
590 $a School code: 0656.
650 4 $a History, European. $3 1018076
650 4 $a Economics, Agricultural. $3 626648
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
690 $a 0335
690 $a 0503
690 $a 0582
710 2 0 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $3 1017814
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-05A.
790 1 0 $a Iggers, Georg G., $e advisor
790 $a 0656
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3089169