東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An analysis of First Amendment issue...

Iparraguirre, Ann Redmond.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of First Amendment issues concerning public funding of private schools with an emphasis on voucher plans in cases adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court as of 2002.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An analysis of First Amendment issues concerning public funding of private schools with an emphasis on voucher plans in cases adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court as of 2002./
作者:	Iparraguirre, Ann Redmond.
面頁冊數:	171 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-02, Section: A, page: 0352.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-02A.
標題:	Education, Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3082026

An analysis of First Amendment issues concerning public funding of private schools with an emphasis on voucher plans in cases adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court as of 2002.
Iparraguirre, Ann Redmond.

An analysis of First Amendment issues concerning public funding of private schools with an emphasis on voucher plans in cases adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court as of 2002. - 171 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-02, Section: A, page: 0352.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Bridgeport, 2003.

In June, 2002, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutional soundness of a voucher plan that had been passed into law in Ohio. It was the first time the highest court rendered a decision in the matter. While the decision answered many questions for legislators and educators, it also raised many new questions.Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

An analysis of First Amendment issues concerning public funding of private schools with an emphasis on voucher plans in cases adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court as of 2002.
LDR:03045nmm 2200313 4500 001 1862854
005 20041215070029.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3082026
035 $a AAI3082026
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Iparraguirre, Ann Redmond. $3 1950391
245 1 3 $a An analysis of First Amendment issues concerning public funding of private schools with an emphasis on voucher plans in cases adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court as of 2002.
300 $a 171 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-02, Section: A, page: 0352.
500 $a Adviser: Alice L. Carolan.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Bridgeport, 2003.
520 $a In June, 2002, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutional soundness of a voucher plan that had been passed into law in Ohio. It was the first time the highest court rendered a decision in the matter. While the decision answered many questions for legislators and educators, it also raised many new questions.
520 $a The United States Constitution directed through the First Amendment that "Congress shall make no law respecting establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...." States are expected to establish and provide a system of public education for grades K--12 to be financed through taxation and available at no charge to all children. The United States Supreme Court has been called on to interpret the Constitution and determine when the use of public funds for education in private, parochial schools is consistent with the United States Constitution.
520 $a This study identified educational, political, socio-economic and constitutional issues resulting from vouchers which use public money to provide tuition to private schools. Twenty-two United States Supreme Court decisions were analyzed to determine if there was evidence of a shift in the Court's jurisprudence in this matter from a "separationist" viewpoint to a "neutral aid" stance. The history of Supreme Court case law which addressed use of public money for private, parochial schools was annotated and relevant case law in states which already have voucher laws was reviewed.
520 $a A summary of the Supreme Court decisions decided through the year 2002, in which government aid was permissible to private, parochial schools under the Federal Constitution, was presented. This study also provided guidelines for government aid to private, parochial schools. The summary of findings was reviewed by a panel of eleven experts including lawyers, administrators and educators from both public and private schools. Their testimony is found in Appendix A. This study concluded with recommendations for further study.
590 $a School code: 0749.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Education, Finance. $3 1020300
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0277
690 $a 0398
710 2 0 $a University of Bridgeport. $3 1021967
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-02A.
790 1 0 $a Carolan, Alice L., $e advisor
790 $a 0749
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3082026