東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Politics of industrialization: Forma...

Lim, Suk-Jun.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Politics of industrialization: Formation of divergent industrial orders in Korea and Taiwan.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Politics of industrialization: Formation of divergent industrial orders in Korea and Taiwan./
作者:	Lim, Suk-Jun.
面頁冊數:	248 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0274.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International58-01A.
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9720050
ISBN:	0591285843

Politics of industrialization: Formation of divergent industrial orders in Korea and Taiwan.
Lim, Suk-Jun.

Politics of industrialization: Formation of divergent industrial orders in Korea and Taiwan. - 248 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0274.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 1997.

Korea and Taiwan have contrasting industrial orders: the Korean industrial order is concentrated and dominated by large, mass producing firms known as chaebol; Taiwan's industrial order is decentralized with a predominance of small- to medium-sized firms that cooperate their production through extensive subcontracting networks. Why such divergence between two countries that supposedly followed a similar trajectory of development?

ISBN: 0591285843Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Politics of industrialization: Formation of divergent industrial orders in Korea and Taiwan.
LDR:03419nmm 2200313 4500 001 1861660
005 20041117065555.5
008 130614s1997 eng d
020 $a 0591285843
035 $a (UnM)AAI9720050
035 $a AAI9720050
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lim, Suk-Jun. $3 1949246
245 1 0 $a Politics of industrialization: Formation of divergent industrial orders in Korea and Taiwan.
300 $a 248 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0274.
500 $a Adviser: Gary Herrigel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 1997.
520 $a Korea and Taiwan have contrasting industrial orders: the Korean industrial order is concentrated and dominated by large, mass producing firms known as chaebol; Taiwan's industrial order is decentralized with a predominance of small- to medium-sized firms that cooperate their production through extensive subcontracting networks. Why such divergence between two countries that supposedly followed a similar trajectory of development?
520 $a The dissertation reinterprets Korean and Taiwanese industrialization by discussing the different methods through which the two countries organize their industry and production. It integrates theoretical argument and historical interpretation in order to address gaps in the "conventional" explanations, represented by neoclassical and developmental state arguments. In their interpretation of industrialization, the conventional views have assumed that politics was simply a matter of resource allocation. This led us to believe that industrialization was a process of achieving efficiency; the state, a strategic policy-making agent; and Korea and Taiwan following a similar developmental trajectory.
520 $a The central contention of this dissertation is that 'politics of industrialization' must be seen as struggles throughout society to work out a systematic way of structuring social relations. From this broader perspective, the dissertation argues that industrialization and its paradigmatic outcomes, "industrial orders" were shaped by the ways in which political leaders dealt with their historically specific problems of legitimacy. The solution to political problems of legitimacy, in turn, led to two different paradigms of industrialization: Korea industrialized on the concept of "mass production," a 'rigid' system of high-volume production using standardized technologies; Taiwan industrialized on "cooperative specialization," a relatively 'flexible' system of producing a variety of goods to niche markets with inter-firm subcontracting networks.
520 $a To reaffirm the argument that politics was important, the dissertation incorporates a least likely case (the footwear industry), and fill the logical gap between the political framework and economic consequences. The case also demonstrates how different industrial orders were created, regulated, and reproduced; how producers organized work differently with comparable technologies; and how they responded to market fluctuations and protectionism (Orderly Marketing Agreements).
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a The University of Chicago. $3 1017389
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 58-01A.
790 1 0 $a Herrigel, Gary, $e advisor
790 $a 0330
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1997
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9720050