東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Metapolicy in public higher educatio...

Bastedo, Michael Nelson.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Metapolicy in public higher education: Activist governing boards and systemic reform.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Metapolicy in public higher education: Activist governing boards and systemic reform./
作者:	Bastedo, Michael Nelson.
面頁冊數:	244 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0816.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-03A.
標題:	Education, Higher. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3085255

Metapolicy in public higher education: Activist governing boards and systemic reform.
Bastedo, Michael Nelson.

Metapolicy in public higher education: Activist governing boards and systemic reform. - 244 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0816.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2003.

This project consists of three embedded case studies of systemic reform in Massachusetts public higher education, where an activist governing board took hold in 1995. Within a neo-institutional theoretical framework, it is argued that these attempts at systemic reform were generated from a highly legitimate metapolicy that established the theory of action from which all policies were developed and implemented. Interviews with over 20 key participants and examination of archival data reveal that even within institutions, governing boards and their staff act strategically by actively manipulating institutional elements in the environment and managing intraorganizational processes. It is concluded that the metapolicy consists of five core elements: system development, mission differentiation, student opportunity, concentration of talent, and managerialism. Each of these five elements was highly legitimate with policymakers and the public, and served to increase the profile and the credibility of the system, a great accomplishment in a state where public higher education has traditionally been treated with indifference and even hostility. This legitimacy, however, has obscured the degree to which some of these policies have negatively impacted student access for underrepresented groups.Subjects--Topical Terms:

543175
Education, Higher.

Metapolicy in public higher education: Activist governing boards and systemic reform.
LDR:02196nmm 2200277 4500 001 1860868
005 20041108065453.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3085255
035 $a AAI3085255
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Bastedo, Michael Nelson. $3 1948493
245 1 0 $a Metapolicy in public higher education: Activist governing boards and systemic reform.
300 $a 244 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0816.
500 $a Adviser: Patricia J. Gumport.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stanford University, 2003.
520 $a This project consists of three embedded case studies of systemic reform in Massachusetts public higher education, where an activist governing board took hold in 1995. Within a neo-institutional theoretical framework, it is argued that these attempts at systemic reform were generated from a highly legitimate metapolicy that established the theory of action from which all policies were developed and implemented. Interviews with over 20 key participants and examination of archival data reveal that even within institutions, governing boards and their staff act strategically by actively manipulating institutional elements in the environment and managing intraorganizational processes. It is concluded that the metapolicy consists of five core elements: system development, mission differentiation, student opportunity, concentration of talent, and managerialism. Each of these five elements was highly legitimate with policymakers and the public, and served to increase the profile and the credibility of the system, a great accomplishment in a state where public higher education has traditionally been treated with indifference and even hostility. This legitimacy, however, has obscured the degree to which some of these policies have negatively impacted student access for underrepresented groups.
590 $a School code: 0212.
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Sociology of. $3 626654
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0617
710 2 0 $a Stanford University. $3 754827
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-03A.
790 1 0 $a Gumport, Patricia J., $e advisor
790 $a 0212
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3085255