東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The impact of New Jersey's three sta...

Calissi, Judith Margaret.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The impact of New Jersey's three standards documents on middle level social studies curriculum and instruction.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The impact of New Jersey's three standards documents on middle level social studies curriculum and instruction./
作者:	Calissi, Judith Margaret.
面頁冊數:	143 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4334.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-12A.
標題:	Education, Curriculum and Instruction. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3118072

The impact of New Jersey's three standards documents on middle level social studies curriculum and instruction.
Calissi, Judith Margaret.

The impact of New Jersey's three standards documents on middle level social studies curriculum and instruction. - 143 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4334.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2004.

In the past decade political and pedagogical discourse has centered on the setting of curriculum standards with assessments as a means of improving American education. There is widespread debate, however, concerning how these reforms affect teaching and learning. This study's purpose was to provide insight into the impact these reforms had on social studies curriculum development and classroom instruction. New Jersey Department of Education developed three documents to guide social studies educators in standards-based reform and the singular testing event in 2001. These are the <italic>Core Curriculum Content Standards in Social Studies</italic>, the <italic>Social Studies Curriculum Framework</italic>, and the <italic>Test Specifications and Sample Items for the Grade Eight Proficiency Assessment in Social Studies</italic>. The focus of the study was two-fold. First, to evaluate the usefulness of the three standards documents this researcher adapted a rubric from a model developed by Achieve, Inc. Second, to ascertain how educators used these documents to guide curriculum and instruction, 19 middle level curriculum supervisors and 8<super>th</super> grade social studies teachers from large and small, wealthy (J) District Factor Groups and poor (A) District factor groups were interviewed to secure qualitative data. Analysis of the three standards documents suggested that only the test specifications provide a clear and concise outline of the knowledge and skills required of 8<super>th</super> grade students, while the standards are broad and vague and the framework is confusingly organized and onerous in size. In-person interviews revealed the following: educators attributed modest curricular changes to the standards, but agreed that this standards document offered little specific guidance. All were supportive of the standards, but educators in wealthy districts were more confident that their standards met or exceeded state standards than those from poor districts. Instructional changes included more higher-order, critical thinking and hands-on activities and use of primary resources, but no organized test prepping occurred. As a whole, this study offers a “snapshot” of standards-based reform suggesting moderate, positive effects.Subjects--Topical Terms:

576301
Education, Curriculum and Instruction.

The impact of New Jersey's three standards documents on middle level social studies curriculum and instruction.
LDR:03210nmm 2200265 4500 001 1859923
005 20041021080236.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3118072
035 $a AAI3118072
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Calissi, Judith Margaret. $3 1947576
245 1 0 $a The impact of New Jersey's three standards documents on middle level social studies curriculum and instruction.
300 $a 143 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4334.
500 $a Chair: Kenneth Carlson.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick, 2004.
520 $a In the past decade political and pedagogical discourse has centered on the setting of curriculum standards with assessments as a means of improving American education. There is widespread debate, however, concerning how these reforms affect teaching and learning. This study's purpose was to provide insight into the impact these reforms had on social studies curriculum development and classroom instruction. New Jersey Department of Education developed three documents to guide social studies educators in standards-based reform and the singular testing event in 2001. These are the <italic>Core Curriculum Content Standards in Social Studies</italic>, the <italic>Social Studies Curriculum Framework</italic>, and the <italic>Test Specifications and Sample Items for the Grade Eight Proficiency Assessment in Social Studies</italic>. The focus of the study was two-fold. First, to evaluate the usefulness of the three standards documents this researcher adapted a rubric from a model developed by Achieve, Inc. Second, to ascertain how educators used these documents to guide curriculum and instruction, 19 middle level curriculum supervisors and 8<super>th</super> grade social studies teachers from large and small, wealthy (J) District Factor Groups and poor (A) District factor groups were interviewed to secure qualitative data. Analysis of the three standards documents suggested that only the test specifications provide a clear and concise outline of the knowledge and skills required of 8<super>th</super> grade students, while the standards are broad and vague and the framework is confusingly organized and onerous in size. In-person interviews revealed the following: educators attributed modest curricular changes to the standards, but agreed that this standards document offered little specific guidance. All were supportive of the standards, but educators in wealthy districts were more confident that their standards met or exceeded state standards than those from poor districts. Instructional changes included more higher-order, critical thinking and hands-on activities and use of primary resources, but no organized test prepping occurred. As a whole, this study offers a “snapshot” of standards-based reform suggesting moderate, positive effects.
590 $a School code: 0190.
650 4 $a Education, Curriculum and Instruction. $3 576301
650 4 $a Education, Social Sciences. $3 1019148
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0534
710 2 0 $a Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick. $3 1017590
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-12A.
790 1 0 $a Carlson, Kenneth, $e advisor
790 $a 0190
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3118072