東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Durable authoritarianism in an age o...

Brownlee, Jason.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy (Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Philippines).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy (Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Philippines)./
作者:	Brownlee, Jason.
面頁冊數:	286 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-01, Section: A, page: 0272.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-01A.
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3120423

Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy (Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Philippines).
Brownlee, Jason.

Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy (Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Philippines). - 286 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-01, Section: A, page: 0272.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2004.

During the past thirty years, an era commonly referred to as the “third wave of democratization,” nearly all authoritarian regimes have experimented with political liberalization and held multiparty elections. Yet while autocratic leaders changed the façades of their governments, fundamental patterns of domination and control remained. Many regimes have consistently manipulated elections. Others have faced surprise defeats at the ballot box, followed by regime change. What explains this variation in regime durability? This project addresses that question by considering the impact of elections on regime endurance and exploring how parties influence a regime's capacity to maintain ruling coalitions.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy (Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Philippines).
LDR:03522nmm 2200313 4500 001 1859786
005 20041014085935.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3120423
035 $a AAI3120423
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Brownlee, Jason. $3 1947443
245 1 0 $a Durable authoritarianism in an age of democracy (Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Philippines).
300 $a 286 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-01, Section: A, page: 0272.
500 $a Adviser: Atul Kohli.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2004.
520 $a During the past thirty years, an era commonly referred to as the “third wave of democratization,” nearly all authoritarian regimes have experimented with political liberalization and held multiparty elections. Yet while autocratic leaders changed the façades of their governments, fundamental patterns of domination and control remained. Many regimes have consistently manipulated elections. Others have faced surprise defeats at the ballot box, followed by regime change. What explains this variation in regime durability? This project addresses that question by considering the impact of elections on regime endurance and exploring how parties influence a regime's capacity to maintain ruling coalitions.
520 $a A statistical analysis of 135 regimes during the period 1975–2000 indicates that multiparty elections neither buttress nor threaten authoritarian regimes. Rather, what matters for the continuation of dictatorship is the institutional structure of the regime. Ruling parties strengthen authoritarian regimes by providing leaders an extended time horizon for the pursuit of individual ambitions and the resolution of intra-coalitional conflicts. Elections do not destabilize regimes. Regimes that fail to maintain institutions for managing elite interests destabilize elections.
520 $a Party decline triggers political instability by provoking insecure elites to exit the coalition and pursue their interests outside the regime, often in partnerships with excluded oppositionists. This realignment of forces weakens the regime's hold over elections, enabling opposition candidates and elite defectors to defeat remaining incumbents at the polls. The electorally successful challenger coalition then holds an opportunity for changing the regime. However, their strategy and success is not determined by the earlier institutional dynamic. Ruling parties are sufficient for regime persistence. The absence of such institutions is necessary but insufficient for the regime's transformation.
520 $a This explanation of authoritarian durability and its inverse, instability and the opportunity for regime change, is built in three stages (historical, institutional, voluntarist) across four cases: Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Egypt and Malaysia are robust ruling party regimes while Iran and the Philippines evince the instability that follows party decline. The dissertation traces elite conflict at regime formation through party institutions and electoral outcomes, closing with an analysis of post-electoral political confrontation and the potential for regime change.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a History, Middle Eastern. $3 1017544
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0333
690 $a 0616
710 2 0 $a Princeton University. $3 645579
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-01A.
790 1 0 $a Kohli, Atul, $e advisor
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3120423