東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How organizational learning influenc...

Truran, William Richard.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How organizational learning influences organizational success.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How organizational learning influences organizational success./
作者:	Truran, William Richard.
面頁冊數:	201 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: A, page: 1503.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-04A.
標題:	Business Administration, Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3010762
ISBN:	0493201939

How organizational learning influences organizational success.
Truran, William Richard.

How organizational learning influences organizational success. - 201 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: A, page: 1503.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stevens Institute of Technology, 2001.

Researchers, academicians and organization leaders have stated that the ability to learn has become increasingly important for success, and organizational knowledge is perhaps the most important resource in organizations. It is of value to society to find how to improve the ways of learning and of obtaining organizational knowledge. This dissertation reviews past literature, develops a conceptual model, develops measures to test the model, and conducts field research to validate the model.

ISBN: 0493201939Subjects--Topical Terms:

626628
Business Administration, Management.

How organizational learning influences organizational success.
LDR:04087nmm 2200373 4500 001 1859447
005 20041020143627.5
008 130614s2001 eng d
020 $a 0493201939
035 $a (UnM)AAI3010762
035 $a AAI3010762
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Truran, William Richard. $3 1947105
245 1 0 $a How organizational learning influences organizational success.
300 $a 201 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-04, Section: A, page: 1503.
500 $a Chairman: Donald N. Merino.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Stevens Institute of Technology, 2001.
520 $a Researchers, academicians and organization leaders have stated that the ability to learn has become increasingly important for success, and organizational knowledge is perhaps the most important resource in organizations. It is of value to society to find how to improve the ways of learning and of obtaining organizational knowledge. This dissertation reviews past literature, develops a conceptual model, develops measures to test the model, and conducts field research to validate the model.
520 $a The research question in this dissertation is: “<italic>What variables and conditions are related to knowledge gained by individuals in organizations and how is that knowledge used effectively by the organization to improve performance?</italic>”
520 $a The model developed contained three sources which influence organizational learning: (1) individual which include personal knowledge and creativity, (2) collective which include collective memory, synergy, and insight, and (3) structural that includes vision.
520 $a A field study was performed using a questionnaire as the research instrument. The Internet and a website were used to collect data which included 660 individuals in 8 organizations. The subjects selected were knowledge workers, and their organizations were knowledge intensive firms.
520 $a The data was evaluated in two parts. The first part has three subgroups: (1) all individuals together in common with a simple relation to success, (2) all individuals with the three groupings of learning influences previously described, and (3) all individuals with three types of success measures described below. The second major group was two industries used for a two-by-two matched comparison.
520 $a The results indicated that the hypotheses related to influences on organizational learning were statistically significant. Influences on learning do affect organizational success (with an R<super>2</super> = .455, p < .000), and learning influences may be combined into three groupings (individual sources, collective sources, and structural sources). This result was indicated in the “all subject” evaluation as well as each of the two industry pairings (significantly different with p < .000). The model of this finding is found in Figure 1.
520 $a Finally, success indicators could be grouped into performance indicators which provided insight into organizational commitment, or “framed views”. The three influences affected framed views of success: (1) outward and product orientation (R<super>2</super> = .383, p < .000), (2) inward and process orientation (R<super>2</super> = .471, p < .000), and (3) financial orientation (R<super>2</super> = .180, p < .007).
520 $a Future research opportunities abound. A stronger linkage to objective measures is very important to convince organizations to make changes. These measures then require metrics to be established, and then benchmark hurdles and best-in-class examples portrayed. Once achieved, greater organizational effectiveness should result.
590 $a School code: 0733.
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Business Administration, Marketing. $3 1017573
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0629
710 2 0 $a Stevens Institute of Technology. $3 1019501
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-04A.
790 1 0 $a Merino, Donald N., $e advisor
790 $a 0733
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2001
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3010762