語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Is a unified account of concepts pos...
~
Byrd, James David, Jr.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Is a unified account of concepts possible?
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Is a unified account of concepts possible?/
作者:
Byrd, James David, Jr.
面頁冊數:
157 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2509.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International64-07A.
標題:
Philosophy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3097426
Is a unified account of concepts possible?
Byrd, James David, Jr.
Is a unified account of concepts possible?
- 157 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2509.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2003.
This dissertation investigated the extent to which a unified account of concepts was possible. The sense of unification intended was whether a theory of concepts could satisfy two prominent roles psychologists take concepts to play: that they are psychological structures that enable categorization, and that these structures are compositional. Of the three current theories of concepts (prototype theory, theory-theory, and conceptual atomism), prototype theory has been held by the cognitive science community to be the most plausible, and yet there have been substantial criticisms that such a theory was not compositional. As a result, this dissertation focused on two investigations: one, to say whether prototype theory could overcome this criticism, and two, to tell if <italic>any</italic> theory of concepts could satisfy both our desiderata. In the course of this dissertation, both tasks were pursued by focusing on each theory (and in some cases, several formulations of the same kind of theory) in an attempt to tell if that theory could account for categorization, and do so in a compositional way. As was discovered, only the prototype theory was found to offer a plausible account of both our constraints.Subjects--Topical Terms:
516511
Philosophy.
Is a unified account of concepts possible?
LDR
:02074nmm 2200277 4500
001
1859377
005
20041014084350.5
008
130614s2003 eng d
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3097426
035
$a
AAI3097426
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Byrd, James David, Jr.
$3
1947037
245
1 0
$a
Is a unified account of concepts possible?
300
$a
157 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2509.
500
$a
Adviser: Robert Cummins.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2003.
520
$a
This dissertation investigated the extent to which a unified account of concepts was possible. The sense of unification intended was whether a theory of concepts could satisfy two prominent roles psychologists take concepts to play: that they are psychological structures that enable categorization, and that these structures are compositional. Of the three current theories of concepts (prototype theory, theory-theory, and conceptual atomism), prototype theory has been held by the cognitive science community to be the most plausible, and yet there have been substantial criticisms that such a theory was not compositional. As a result, this dissertation focused on two investigations: one, to say whether prototype theory could overcome this criticism, and two, to tell if <italic>any</italic> theory of concepts could satisfy both our desiderata. In the course of this dissertation, both tasks were pursued by focusing on each theory (and in some cases, several formulations of the same kind of theory) in an attempt to tell if that theory could account for categorization, and do so in a compositional way. As was discovered, only the prototype theory was found to offer a plausible account of both our constraints.
590
$a
School code: 0029.
650
4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
516511
650
4
$a
Psychology, General.
$3
1018034
650
4
$a
Biology, Neuroscience.
$3
1017680
690
$a
0422
690
$a
0621
690
$a
0317
710
2 0
$a
University of California, Davis.
$3
1018682
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
64-07A.
790
1 0
$a
Cummins, Robert,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0029
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2003
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3097426
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9178077
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入