東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the th...

Lewis, Sarah Janvier.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the thoracic duct: The controversy over the circulation of the blood and lymph in seventeenth-century Europe (France).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the thoracic duct: The controversy over the circulation of the blood and lymph in seventeenth-century Europe (France)./
作者:	Lewis, Sarah Janvier.
面頁冊數:	299 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 1051.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-03A.
標題:	History of Science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3084332

Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the thoracic duct: The controversy over the circulation of the blood and lymph in seventeenth-century Europe (France).
Lewis, Sarah Janvier.

Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the thoracic duct: The controversy over the circulation of the blood and lymph in seventeenth-century Europe (France). - 299 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 1051.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2003.

In 1651, Jean Pecquet, a Parisian medical student, published his Experimenta Nova Anatomica, that both confirmed William Harvey's theory of the circulation of the blood and challenged the foundations of medicine itself. Based on his experiments, Pecquet argued that food was not transformed into blood in the liver. Instead, it traveled through the lacteal veins to a receptacle in the mesentery, then rose through a duct to the subclavian veins and to the heart. The heart, not the liver, was thus responsible for the fabrication of blood. In a dramatic divergence from contemporary medical writers, Pecquet aligned himself with a new school of scientific argument and demonstrated his claims by applying principles taken from physics and chemistry.Subjects--Topical Terms:

896972
History of Science.

Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the thoracic duct: The controversy over the circulation of the blood and lymph in seventeenth-century Europe (France).
LDR:02905nmm 2200277 4500 001 1859271
005 20041105113955.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3084332
035 $a AAI3084332
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Lewis, Sarah Janvier. $3 1946935
245 1 0 $a Jean Pecquet (1622--1674) and the thoracic duct: The controversy over the circulation of the blood and lymph in seventeenth-century Europe (France).
300 $a 299 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 1051.
500 $a Director: Frederic Lawrence Holmes.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2003.
520 $a In 1651, Jean Pecquet, a Parisian medical student, published his Experimenta Nova Anatomica, that both confirmed William Harvey's theory of the circulation of the blood and challenged the foundations of medicine itself. Based on his experiments, Pecquet argued that food was not transformed into blood in the liver. Instead, it traveled through the lacteal veins to a receptacle in the mesentery, then rose through a duct to the subclavian veins and to the heart. The heart, not the liver, was thus responsible for the fabrication of blood. In a dramatic divergence from contemporary medical writers, Pecquet aligned himself with a new school of scientific argument and demonstrated his claims by applying principles taken from physics and chemistry.
520 $a This dissertation studies the ensuing scholarly attention. Historians have tended to devote their attention to scientific developments in England during this period. After a chapter on physiology prior to Pecquet, I set Pecquet's life and treatise in context. I then follow the controversy chronologically until its end, which more or less coincides with Pecquet's death in 1674. In this controversy, dozens of doctors and other savants throughout Europe reacted to Pecquet's work. In their letters and treatises, his ideas were pulled in multiple directions---partially adopted, partially rejected, partially ignored---until the medical community arrived at an uncertain consensus, accepting the anatomical changes, while asserting that practical medicine remained unaltered. Pecquet's ideas, however, would have a wide influence outside medicine on both the iatrophysical and iatrochemical schools of physiology that were inspired in part by his work. From this study of the Pecquet controversy emerges a deeper understanding of a complex period, in which discoveries, new styles of argumentation and approaches to investigation challenged the foundations of medical and scientific knowledge.
590 $a School code: 0265.
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
650 4 $a Biography. $3 531296
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0304
710 2 0 $a Yale University. $3 515640
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-03A.
790 1 0 $a Holmes, Frederic Lawrence, $e advisor
790 $a 0265
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3084332