東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Common Pot: Indigenous writing a...

Brooks, Lisa Tanya.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Common Pot: Indigenous writing and the reconstruction of native space in the Northeast.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Common Pot: Indigenous writing and the reconstruction of native space in the Northeast./
作者:	Brooks, Lisa Tanya.
面頁冊數:	347 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4461.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-12A.
標題:	Literature, American. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114531

The Common Pot: Indigenous writing and the reconstruction of native space in the Northeast.
Brooks, Lisa Tanya.

The Common Pot: Indigenous writing and the reconstruction of native space in the Northeast. - 347 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4461.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2004.

“The Common Pot: Indigenous Writing and the Reconstruction of Native Space in the Northeast” builds on current conversations within the fields of Early American Indian Literature, American Indian History, and Native Literary Criticism to reconstruct the historical space of the northeast through the writings of its indigenous inhabitants. The project entailed intensive research and recovery of Algonquian and Iroquoian texts, and the development of a theoretical framework based on the language and oral literature from which these texts emerged. While most literary critics have portrayed early native writers either as individuals “caught between two worlds,” or as “subjects” whom, even as they resisted the colonial world, struggled to exist within it, this study demonstrates the ways in which native leaders, including Samson Occom, Joseph Brant, Hendrick Aupaumut, and William Apess, adopted writing as a tool to reconstruct and reclaim “native rights” and “native land.” In particular, it explores the operation of writing within the network of waterways and relations that constitutes the “native space” of the northeast.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017657
Literature, American.

The Common Pot: Indigenous writing and the reconstruction of native space in the Northeast.
LDR:03265nmm 2200289 4500 001 1858469
005 20040927074234.5
008 130614s2004 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3114531
035 $a AAI3114531
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Brooks, Lisa Tanya. $3 975760
245 1 0 $a The Common Pot: Indigenous writing and the reconstruction of native space in the Northeast.
300 $a 347 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4461.
500 $a Adviser: Sunn Shelley Wong.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2004.
520 $a “The Common Pot: Indigenous Writing and the Reconstruction of Native Space in the Northeast” builds on current conversations within the fields of Early American Indian Literature, American Indian History, and Native Literary Criticism to reconstruct the historical space of the northeast through the writings of its indigenous inhabitants. The project entailed intensive research and recovery of Algonquian and Iroquoian texts, and the development of a theoretical framework based on the language and oral literature from which these texts emerged. While most literary critics have portrayed early native writers either as individuals “caught between two worlds,” or as “subjects” whom, even as they resisted the colonial world, struggled to exist within it, this study demonstrates the ways in which native leaders, including Samson Occom, Joseph Brant, Hendrick Aupaumut, and William Apess, adopted writing as a tool to reconstruct and reclaim “native rights” and “native land.” In particular, it explores the operation of writing within the network of waterways and relations that constitutes the “native space” of the northeast.
520 $a From within these texts, a trope emerges that encapsulates this understanding of native space. The “Common Pot” is a metaphor that appears in stories, speeches, and written documents during the 18<super>th</super> and 19<super>th</super> centuries, embodying land, community, and the shared space of sustenance between relations. The “pot” can refer to the village, or to the networks of alliance on which people relied for support. Native leaders often invoked the metaphor to emphasize the need for unity and the reality of interdependence, especially as colonial control over native lands increased. A central contention of the dissertation is that the texts that emerged from within this space constitute a uniquely indigenous literary tradition. Far from being “corrupted” by writing, native people frequently resisted the role designed for them by their missionary teachers, and used the skills they acquired to compose petitions, political tracts, and speeches; to record community councils and histories; and, most importantly, to imagine collectively the routes through which the Common Pot could survive.
590 $a School code: 0058.
650 4 $a Literature, American. $3 1017657
650 4 $a American Studies. $3 1017604
650 4 $a Anthropology, Cultural. $3 735016
690 $a 0591
690 $a 0323
690 $a 0326
710 2 0 $a Cornell University. $3 530586
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-12A.
790 1 0 $a Wong, Sunn Shelley, $e advisor
790 $a 0058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2004
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114531