東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The relevance of historical inquiry ...

McMahon, Christopher.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith: A comparative study of the historical methodologies of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith: A comparative study of the historical methodologies of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright./
作者:	McMahon, Christopher.
面頁冊數:	321 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0943.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-03A.
標題:	Religion, Biblical Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3084431

The relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith: A comparative study of the historical methodologies of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright.
McMahon, Christopher.

The relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith: A comparative study of the historical methodologies of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright. - 321 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0943.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2003.

This dissertation advances the general discussion of the relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith by examining the works of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright on the historical Jesus. The first part of the dissertation explicates Meier's account of the historian's task and how it relates to theology as well as Meier's methodological proposal for conducting historical Jesus research. The dissertation then proceeds to examine his performance of historical Jesus research in light of his account of the historian's task, its relationship to theology, and his methodological proposal for historical Jesus research. The first part of the dissertation concludes that Meier's performance of historical Jesus research goes beyond the narrow methodology he articulates, and calls into question his account of the relationship between critical history and Christian faith. The second part of the dissertation investigates Wright's account of cognitional theory (critical realism), his methodological approach to the historical Jesus, and his understanding of its relationship to theology. Examples of Wright's performance are enlisted to examine this understanding. The second part of the dissertation concludes that Wright's performance falters as it fails to account for the development of the biblical material, and fails to assess the historicity of particular biblical passages. The final section of the dissertation lays out how and why Meier and Wright differ in their respective understandings of historical inquiry, their methodologies for and performance of historical Jesus research, and their explicit positions on the significance of historical inquiry for Christian faith. By focusing on two major figures in historical Jesus research and by clarifying their differences, this investigation helps define the issues at stake in the ongoing discussion of “the historical Jesus” and “the Christ of faith.”Subjects--Topical Terms:

1020189
Religion, Biblical Studies.

The relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith: A comparative study of the historical methodologies of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright.
LDR:02885nmm 2200265 4500 001 1858240
005 20040927072452.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3084431
035 $a AAI3084431
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a McMahon, Christopher. $3 1945936
245 1 0 $a The relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith: A comparative study of the historical methodologies of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright.
300 $a 321 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-03, Section: A, page: 0943.
500 $a Director: William P. Loewe.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2003.
520 $a This dissertation advances the general discussion of the relevance of historical inquiry for the Christian faith by examining the works of J. P. Meier and N. T. Wright on the historical Jesus. The first part of the dissertation explicates Meier's account of the historian's task and how it relates to theology as well as Meier's methodological proposal for conducting historical Jesus research. The dissertation then proceeds to examine his performance of historical Jesus research in light of his account of the historian's task, its relationship to theology, and his methodological proposal for historical Jesus research. The first part of the dissertation concludes that Meier's performance of historical Jesus research goes beyond the narrow methodology he articulates, and calls into question his account of the relationship between critical history and Christian faith. The second part of the dissertation investigates Wright's account of cognitional theory (critical realism), his methodological approach to the historical Jesus, and his understanding of its relationship to theology. Examples of Wright's performance are enlisted to examine this understanding. The second part of the dissertation concludes that Wright's performance falters as it fails to account for the development of the biblical material, and fails to assess the historicity of particular biblical passages. The final section of the dissertation lays out how and why Meier and Wright differ in their respective understandings of historical inquiry, their methodologies for and performance of historical Jesus research, and their explicit positions on the significance of historical inquiry for Christian faith. By focusing on two major figures in historical Jesus research and by clarifying their differences, this investigation helps define the issues at stake in the ongoing discussion of “the historical Jesus” and “the Christ of faith.”
590 $a School code: 0043.
650 4 $a Religion, Biblical Studies. $3 1020189
650 4 $a Theology. $3 516533
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0469
710 2 0 $a The Catholic University of America. $3 1019220
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-03A.
790 1 0 $a Loewe, William P., $e advisor
790 $a 0043
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3084431