東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

21st century risk reduction methodol...

Brown, Donald Craig.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

21st century risk reduction methodologies for the fire service (Oklahoma).

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	21st century risk reduction methodologies for the fire service (Oklahoma)./
Author:	Brown, Donald Craig.
Description:	87 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 2248.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-06A.
Subject:	Political Science, Public Administration. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3094027

21st century risk reduction methodologies for the fire service (Oklahoma).
Brown, Donald Craig.

21st century risk reduction methodologies for the fire service (Oklahoma). - 87 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 2248.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2003.

<italic>Scope and method of study</italic>. The purpose of this study was to determine the need for risk reduction methodologies within the Tulsa Fire Department in Tulsa, Oklahoma in order to comply with the National Fire Protection Standard 1710: <italic>Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments Current Edition: 2001 </italic>. The study was conducted on 750,000 database records for 2001. Time Objectives, Staffing Objectives, and Deployment Objectives were tested with fourteen null hypotheses. The author used z scores converted to a DCB/1710/GAP score to determine compliance and significance.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017438
Political Science, Public Administration.

21st century risk reduction methodologies for the fire service (Oklahoma).
LDR:02651nmm 2200289 4500 001 1857987
005 20040823111713.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3094027
035 $a AAI3094027
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Brown, Donald Craig. $3 1945694
245 1 0 $a 21st century risk reduction methodologies for the fire service (Oklahoma).
300 $a 87 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 2248.
500 $a Adviser: James J. Lawler.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2003.
520 $a <italic>Scope and method of study</italic>. The purpose of this study was to determine the need for risk reduction methodologies within the Tulsa Fire Department in Tulsa, Oklahoma in order to comply with the National Fire Protection Standard 1710: <italic>Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments Current Edition: 2001 </italic>. The study was conducted on 750,000 database records for 2001. Time Objectives, Staffing Objectives, and Deployment Objectives were tested with fourteen null hypotheses. The author used z scores converted to a DCB/1710/GAP score to determine compliance and significance.
520 $a <italic>Findings and conclusions</italic>. A department meeting the specific requirements of the selected portions of Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 dealing with response times, staffing objectives, and deployment objectives of 1710 would score a 100 on the Compliance Scale (CS) for each objective. Conversely, a department meeting none of the specific requirements of 1710 would score a 0. A CS score of less than 100 for the objective indicates a “Gap” in the department's compliance with the standard. The TFD total compliance score on the DCB/1710/GAP instrument was calculated in the following manner. The Response Time Objectives were scored as 62.90, the Staffing Objective was scored as 84.18, the RIC Deployment Objective was scored as 13.02, and the overall CS was calculated as 65.61. This indicates a GAP of 34.39 points of the Compliant Agency Score. In other words TFD meets 65% of the four areas examined by this study. The study includes the DCB/1710/GAP instrument and recommendations for improvement.
590 $a School code: 0664.
650 4 $a Political Science, Public Administration. $3 1017438
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Occupational Health and Safety. $3 1017799
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0354
710 2 0 $a Oklahoma State University. $3 626630
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-06A.
790 1 0 $a Lawler, James J., $e advisor
790 $a 0664
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3094027