東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A socio-cultural analysis of the eth...

Hazen, Cynthia Diane.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A socio-cultural analysis of the ethical standards of care in psychotherapy professions in the United States: Psychiatry, psychology and social work.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A socio-cultural analysis of the ethical standards of care in psychotherapy professions in the United States: Psychiatry, psychology and social work./
作者:	Hazen, Cynthia Diane.
面頁冊數:	411 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-10, Section: A, page: 3591.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International62-10A.
標題:	Sociology, Social Structure and Development. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3031576
ISBN:	0493437428

A socio-cultural analysis of the ethical standards of care in psychotherapy professions in the United States: Psychiatry, psychology and social work.
Hazen, Cynthia Diane.

A socio-cultural analysis of the ethical standards of care in psychotherapy professions in the United States: Psychiatry, psychology and social work. - 411 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-10, Section: A, page: 3591.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2002.

This qualitative study explores the development and modifications of ethical standards for the practice of psychotherapy in the professions of psychiatry, psychology and social work. Research methods for this study included ethnographic field observation of national and North Carolina professional meetings and unstructured interviews with members and staff of professions' organizations who shaped and implemented ethics standards and regulations. Archival records of professional meeting minutes and historical accounts were reviewed. Three iterations of each profession's ethics codes and discourses (1950s, 1970s, 1990s) were compared and analyzed and each profession's sanctioning history was examined. The moral culture in which ethics codes emerged was examined.

ISBN: 0493437428Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017425
Sociology, Social Structure and Development.

A socio-cultural analysis of the ethical standards of care in psychotherapy professions in the United States: Psychiatry, psychology and social work.
LDR:03714nmm 2200337 4500 001 1857459
005 20041123145136.5
008 130614s2002 eng d
020 $a 0493437428
035 $a (UnM)AAI3031576
035 $a AAI3031576
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Hazen, Cynthia Diane. $3 1945178
245 1 2 $a A socio-cultural analysis of the ethical standards of care in psychotherapy professions in the United States: Psychiatry, psychology and social work.
300 $a 411 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-10, Section: A, page: 3591.
500 $a Major Professor: Murray Melbin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University, 2002.
520 $a This qualitative study explores the development and modifications of ethical standards for the practice of psychotherapy in the professions of psychiatry, psychology and social work. Research methods for this study included ethnographic field observation of national and North Carolina professional meetings and unstructured interviews with members and staff of professions' organizations who shaped and implemented ethics standards and regulations. Archival records of professional meeting minutes and historical accounts were reviewed. Three iterations of each profession's ethics codes and discourses (1950s, 1970s, 1990s) were compared and analyzed and each profession's sanctioning history was examined. The moral culture in which ethics codes emerged was examined.
520 $a Each profession's ethical care standards became more detailed and binding over time. All professions' ethics codes required a treatment contract, which evidenced increasing respect for the authority of the patient/client in determining the course and nature of treatment. These professions' ethics standards reflected differing identities. Psychiatry was the most paternalistic, carrying the greatest burden of responsibility, and was oriented toward a biological understanding of people. Psychology was the most positivist and research-oriented, relying on psychological testing and research findings as the lens through which to determine treatment. Social work focused on social factors and considered psychotherapy interventions in the context of alleviating oppression and deprivation. All three professions imposed sanctions on professionals for criminal behavior, professional misconduct (including sexual relationships with patients/clients), substandard or incompetent care, and substance abuse.
520 $a Modern US culture, as reflected in these professions, revealed a steady movement toward utilitarian moral philosophy combined with a commitment to personal autonomy (client self-determination). Professions' ethical care standards for conducting psychotherapy evidenced increasing rationalization and bureaucratic structuring, and were influenced by the transition of healthcare to a commodity subject to market values. Findings from this study demonstrated the dependence of psychotherapy professions on society for the definition of moral/ethical standards. Diversity within professional membership and the decrease in the power of professions to dictate their own moral principles created an opportunity for communicative action, as described by Habermas. Accordingly, ethical principles and standards emerged from a dialogue between representatives of all groups subjected to them.
590 $a School code: 0017.
650 4 $a Sociology, Social Structure and Development. $3 1017425
650 4 $a Social Work. $3 617587
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Mental Health. $3 1017693
690 $a 0700
690 $a 0452
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0347
710 2 0 $a Boston University. $3 1017454
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 62-10A.
790 1 0 $a Melbin, Murray, $e advisor
790 $a 0017
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2002
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3031576