東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A comparison of the characteristics ...

Xie, Xuehui.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A comparison of the characteristics of curriculum design and instruction as reflected in National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Chinese Ministry of Education mathematics standards as well as the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of these characteristics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison of the characteristics of curriculum design and instruction as reflected in National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Chinese Ministry of Education mathematics standards as well as the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of these characteristics./
作者:	Xie, Xuehui.
面頁冊數:	360 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 3987.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-11A.
標題:	Education, Mathematics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3111961

A comparison of the characteristics of curriculum design and instruction as reflected in National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Chinese Ministry of Education mathematics standards as well as the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of these characteristics.
Xie, Xuehui.

A comparison of the characteristics of curriculum design and instruction as reflected in National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Chinese Ministry of Education mathematics standards as well as the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of these characteristics. - 360 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 3987.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2003.

This study compares NCTM and MOE national mathematics standards. The following differences are identified. First, in implementing mathematics “for all students,” MOE proposes to establish national standards based on average students, and to design a curriculum with elective content in order to allow more capable students to learn beyond the minimum mathematics that are required for all students. By contrast, NCTM requires all students to study the same minimum mathematics, without specifying the aptitude level on which the standards are based. Second, NCTM prefers that learning begins from students' personal experiences and believes that students naturally develop problem-solving skills through their own exploration. Cognitive development is regarded as a natural maturation of students, instruction largely follows students' cognitive developmental levels, and teachers are facilitators. MOE advocates that learning must be under teachers' guidance and that instruction precedes cognitive development. Third, NCTM focuses on problem-solving, where students learn by doing—manipulating of materials is expressly encouraged in pre-k–8. In MOE manipulating of materials is primarily used to lower grade levels. Fourth, NCTM and MOE have different approaches to fostering students' mathematical skills and ability. Fifth, in NCTM problem-solving is the major focus of curriculum design. In MOE, presenting mathematics materials based on the structure of mathematics and students' cognitive development is the major focus.Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017588
Education, Mathematics.

A comparison of the characteristics of curriculum design and instruction as reflected in National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Chinese Ministry of Education mathematics standards as well as the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of these characteristics.
LDR:03194nmm 2200277 4500 001 1857065
005 20040806102501.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3111961
035 $a AAI3111961
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Xie, Xuehui. $3 1944804
245 1 0 $a A comparison of the characteristics of curriculum design and instruction as reflected in National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Chinese Ministry of Education mathematics standards as well as the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of these characteristics.
300 $a 360 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: A, page: 3987.
500 $a Chairperson: Daniel Mueller.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2003.
520 $a This study compares NCTM and MOE national mathematics standards. The following differences are identified. First, in implementing mathematics “for all students,” MOE proposes to establish national standards based on average students, and to design a curriculum with elective content in order to allow more capable students to learn beyond the minimum mathematics that are required for all students. By contrast, NCTM requires all students to study the same minimum mathematics, without specifying the aptitude level on which the standards are based. Second, NCTM prefers that learning begins from students' personal experiences and believes that students naturally develop problem-solving skills through their own exploration. Cognitive development is regarded as a natural maturation of students, instruction largely follows students' cognitive developmental levels, and teachers are facilitators. MOE advocates that learning must be under teachers' guidance and that instruction precedes cognitive development. Third, NCTM focuses on problem-solving, where students learn by doing—manipulating of materials is expressly encouraged in pre-k–8. In MOE manipulating of materials is primarily used to lower grade levels. Fourth, NCTM and MOE have different approaches to fostering students' mathematical skills and ability. Fifth, in NCTM problem-solving is the major focus of curriculum design. In MOE, presenting mathematics materials based on the structure of mathematics and students' cognitive development is the major focus.
520 $a In order to see how these differences are practiced in actual curriculum-making, a sample of NCTM standards-based curricula and a sample of MOE standards-based curricula are chosen as representative for comparison. Following this, the theoretical and philosophical underpinnings that cause the major differences between NCTM and MOE are discussed: NCTM adopts progressive learning theory and pragmatism, while MOE adopts dialectical materialist learning theory and philosophy. The relative strengths and weaknesses of the two types of mathematics education are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0093.
650 4 $a Education, Mathematics. $3 1017588
650 4 $a Education, Philosophy of. $3 783746
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0998
710 2 0 $a Indiana University. $3 960096
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-11A.
790 1 0 $a Mueller, Daniel, $e advisor
790 $a 0093
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3111961