東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Japanese complaining in English: A s...

Shea, Hisae Kuribara.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Japanese complaining in English: A study of interlanguage pragmatics.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Japanese complaining in English: A study of interlanguage pragmatics./
作者:	Shea, Hisae Kuribara.
面頁冊數:	200 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1629.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-05A.
標題:	Language, Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3091292

Japanese complaining in English: A study of interlanguage pragmatics.
Shea, Hisae Kuribara.

Japanese complaining in English: A study of interlanguage pragmatics. - 200 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1629.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Columbia University Teachers College, 2003.

Nonnative speakers often cannot complain effectively in English. This study compares complaining by Japanese speakers of English living in America (JEAs), Japanese speakers of Japanese living in Japan (JJJs), and American speakers of English living in America (AEAs).Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018079
Language, Linguistics.

Japanese complaining in English: A study of interlanguage pragmatics.
LDR:03454nmm 2200325 4500 001 1856702
005 20040728111040.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3091292
035 $a AAI3091292
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Shea, Hisae Kuribara. $3 1944467
245 1 0 $a Japanese complaining in English: A study of interlanguage pragmatics.
300 $a 200 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-05, Section: A, page: 1629.
500 $a Sponsor: Leslie M. Beebe.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Columbia University Teachers College, 2003.
520 $a Nonnative speakers often cannot complain effectively in English. This study compares complaining by Japanese speakers of English living in America (JEAs), Japanese speakers of Japanese living in Japan (JJJs), and American speakers of English living in America (AEAs).
520 $a Participants completed an oral role-enactment interview by spontaneously responding to 12 complaint-provoking situations presented on audiotape. Responses were tape-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed statistically regarding: (a) frequency of pragmatic strategies; (b) strong or weak pragmatic transfer as defined by frequency algorithms; (c) effects of relative status, social distance, and gender of speaker and addressee on frequency; and (d) relative ordering of strategies. Intergroup differences in content were also examined.
520 $a AEAs had the highest, and JJJs the lowest, frequency of most strategies; JEAs tended to be intermediate. JEAs exhibited weak transfer for all strategies combined, and strong transfer for several individual strategies; no evidence of transfer was detected for several other strategies. In their ordering of strategies JJJs showed more conformity, and AEAs more individuality; JEAs were intermediate. The content of strategies often varied among the groups. All groups tended to employ strategies more frequently towards familiar persons than strangers, but JJJs showed this social distance effect to a lesser degree than AEAs or JEAs did. All groups used strategies least frequently toward status equals, compared with status superiors or inferiors; however, JJJs showed only a modest relative status effect. Speaker's gender influenced the frequency of strategies in JJJs only. No group showed a significant effect of addressee's gender.
520 $a My data support the following conclusions: Although Americans and Japanese shared numerous features when complaining, they differed greatly in their frequency, order, and content of several strategies. Social distance and relative status exerted the most important effects on frequency of strategies, while gender had less influence. JJJs showed relatively blunted effects of social distance and relative status, failing to support the claim that Japanese are more sensitive to these social variables. Differences in frequencies of several strategies between JEAs and AEAs were consistent with effects of pragmatic transfer. Finally, statistical analysis permitted delineation of the novel concept of weak versus strong degrees of transfer.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Education, Language and Literature. $3 1018115
650 4 $a Education, Bilingual and Multicultural. $3 626653
650 4 $a Language, Modern. $3 1018098
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0282
690 $a 0291
710 2 0 $a Columbia University Teachers College. $3 1250841
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-05A.
790 1 0 $a Beebe, Leslie M., $e advisor
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=3091292