東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A critical examination of the practi...

Cummins, Deborah Salvail.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A critical examination of the practice of bioethics consultation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A critical examination of the practice of bioethics consultation./
作者:	Cummins, Deborah Salvail.
面頁冊數:	249 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-12, Section: B, page: 6250.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International59-12B.
標題:	Health Sciences, Health Care Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=9913720
ISBN:	0599122358

A critical examination of the practice of bioethics consultation.
Cummins, Deborah Salvail.

A critical examination of the practice of bioethics consultation. - 249 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-12, Section: B, page: 6250.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston, 1998.

In this dissertation, I describe and assess the current practice of bioethics consultation and recommend a direction for its future. Today, bioethics consultation is characterized by diversity and ambiguity. I argue that the controversial question of who can be a bioethics consultant is related to the location of bioethics among academic disciplines. Thus, if bioethics is a branch of philosophy, then only philosophers should be bioethics consultants; if it is an integral part of medical practice, then clinicians are the logical choice for bioethics consultants; and if it is multidisciplinary, then bioethics consultants will represent many disciplines. I make a critical distinction between multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary, and I argue that bioethicists should strive to nurture and sustain a distinct mode of thinking, a unique perspective, and the imagination to solve ethical problems within an integrated and interdisciplinary paradigm rather than from an individual philosophical, medical, legal, or political perspective.

ISBN: 0599122358Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017922
Health Sciences, Health Care Management.

A critical examination of the practice of bioethics consultation.
LDR:03504nmm 2200325 4500 001 1856390
005 20040701122241.5
008 130614s1998 eng d
020 $a 0599122358
035 $a (UnM)AAI9913720
035 $a AAI9913720
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Cummins, Deborah Salvail. $3 1944170
245 1 0 $a A critical examination of the practice of bioethics consultation.
300 $a 249 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-12, Section: B, page: 6250.
500 $a Supervisor: William J. Winslade.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston, 1998.
520 $a In this dissertation, I describe and assess the current practice of bioethics consultation and recommend a direction for its future. Today, bioethics consultation is characterized by diversity and ambiguity. I argue that the controversial question of who can be a bioethics consultant is related to the location of bioethics among academic disciplines. Thus, if bioethics is a branch of philosophy, then only philosophers should be bioethics consultants; if it is an integral part of medical practice, then clinicians are the logical choice for bioethics consultants; and if it is multidisciplinary, then bioethics consultants will represent many disciplines. I make a critical distinction between multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary, and I argue that bioethicists should strive to nurture and sustain a distinct mode of thinking, a unique perspective, and the imagination to solve ethical problems within an integrated and interdisciplinary paradigm rather than from an individual philosophical, medical, legal, or political perspective.
520 $a I review the connotations of the terminology used to discuss bioethics and I determine that, in the context of consultation, 'bioethics' and 'healthcare ethics' are understood to include persons from diverse backgrounds; whereas the terms 'medical ethics,' 'clinical ethics,' and 'biomedical ethics' have narrow and exclusive associations. I develop a typology that divides healthcare ethicists into three categories: academic ethicists, ethics committee members, and bioethics consultants. Differentiating the consulting role from other practices of bioethicists was a necessary prelude to discussing the issues of standards, training, and educational requirements for healthcare ethics consultants. I review and compare six categories of training programs for bioethicists and conclude that to achieve more accountability, curriculums need to target the specific skills and knowledge needed by consultants.
520 $a I argue that boundaries between bioethics consultation and other practices, such as counseling, can be established by clarifying appropriate roles and methods for healthcare ethics consultants. I discuss six procedural roles that bioethics consultants can utilize to assist others in resolving ethical problems in a healthcare setting. Finally, after examining bioethics consultation within a theoretical and sociohistorical context, I conclude that it is not a profession, but it is moving in the direction of greater professional status.
590 $a School code: 0764.
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Health Care Management. $3 1017922
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Health Sciences, General. $3 1017817
690 $a 0769
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0566
710 2 0 $a The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston. $3 1250167
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 59-12B.
790 1 0 $a Winslade, William J., $e advisor
790 $a 0764
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1998
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoeng/servlet/advanced?query=9913720