東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Prospecting for biodiversity: The se...

Carrizosa, Santiago.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Prospecting for biodiversity: The search for legal and institutional frameworks.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Prospecting for biodiversity: The search for legal and institutional frameworks./
作者:	Carrizosa, Santiago.
面頁冊數:	271 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0279.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International58-01A.
標題:	Political Science, International Law and Relations. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9720602
ISBN:	0591292491

Prospecting for biodiversity: The search for legal and institutional frameworks.
Carrizosa, Santiago.

Prospecting for biodiversity: The search for legal and institutional frameworks. - 271 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0279.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 1996.

For several decades, pharmaceutical companies have engaged in bioprospecting activities in developing countries. However, in many cases, these companies have failed to compensate local peoples for their knowledge used in the production of drugs. Consequently, these activities have been subject to intense scrutiny at the national and international level. This awareness has contributed to the elaboration of international laws and novel bioprospecting initiatives. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), laws that regulate access to genetic resources, and the International Cooperative Biodiversity Groups (ICBGs) are approaches that address unique issues pertaining to bioprospecting of genetic resources. However, these approaches are not flawless. They are experiments that need to be tested and analyzed. The main objectives of this dissertation are to: (1) analyze the relationship between these approaches and how they address the issue of bioprospecting; and (2) identify bioprospecting guidelines to facilitate the implementation of future bioprospecting projects. These objectives are addressed through the analysis of a conceptual framework for the implementation of the ICBGs. According to this framework implementation of the ICBGs should be made according to the following four factors: (1) the CBD, (2) contractual relationships between parties of bioprospecting groups, (3) contractual provisions of bioprospecting agreements, and (4) in-country laws, policies and the organizational structure of the government. These factors have and will continue to affect the implementation of the ICBGs and other bioprospecting groups. A thorough analysis of them in the context of the ICBGs and in comparison to other projects provides elements for the identification of valuable lessons for future bioprospecting initiatives.

ISBN: 0591292491Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017399
Political Science, International Law and Relations.

Prospecting for biodiversity: The search for legal and institutional frameworks.
LDR:02753nmm 2200289 4500 001 1855135
005 20040624070159.5
008 130614s1996 eng d
020 $a 0591292491
035 $a (UnM)AAI9720602
035 $a AAI9720602
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Carrizosa, Santiago. $3 1942957
245 1 0 $a Prospecting for biodiversity: The search for legal and institutional frameworks.
300 $a 271 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0279.
500 $a Director: William W. Shaw.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 1996.
520 $a For several decades, pharmaceutical companies have engaged in bioprospecting activities in developing countries. However, in many cases, these companies have failed to compensate local peoples for their knowledge used in the production of drugs. Consequently, these activities have been subject to intense scrutiny at the national and international level. This awareness has contributed to the elaboration of international laws and novel bioprospecting initiatives. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), laws that regulate access to genetic resources, and the International Cooperative Biodiversity Groups (ICBGs) are approaches that address unique issues pertaining to bioprospecting of genetic resources. However, these approaches are not flawless. They are experiments that need to be tested and analyzed. The main objectives of this dissertation are to: (1) analyze the relationship between these approaches and how they address the issue of bioprospecting; and (2) identify bioprospecting guidelines to facilitate the implementation of future bioprospecting projects. These objectives are addressed through the analysis of a conceptual framework for the implementation of the ICBGs. According to this framework implementation of the ICBGs should be made according to the following four factors: (1) the CBD, (2) contractual relationships between parties of bioprospecting groups, (3) contractual provisions of bioprospecting agreements, and (4) in-country laws, policies and the organizational structure of the government. These factors have and will continue to affect the implementation of the ICBGs and other bioprospecting groups. A thorough analysis of them in the context of the ICBGs and in comparison to other projects provides elements for the identification of valuable lessons for future bioprospecting initiatives.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Chemistry, Pharmaceutical. $3 550957
690 $a 0616
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0491
710 2 0 $a The University of Arizona. $3 1017508
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 58-01A.
790 1 0 $a Shaw, William W., $e advisor
790 $a 0009
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1996
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9720602