東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Location, location, location: The s...

Geverdt, Douglas E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Location, location, location: The spatial quality of urban school locale classifications in the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Location, location, location: The spatial quality of urban school locale classifications in the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data./
作者:	Geverdt, Douglas E.
面頁冊數:	185 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 1922.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-06A.
標題:	Education, Administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3096097

Location, location, location: The spatial quality of urban school locale classifications in the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data.
Geverdt, Douglas E.

Location, location, location: The spatial quality of urban school locale classifications in the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data. - 185 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 1922.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2003.

As part of its mission to monitor the condition of education in the U.S., the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) assigns a geographic locale indicator to each public school in the Common Core of Data (CCD)—the official administrative universe of public schools and school districts in the U.S. These locale indicators are used to help construct representative samples for other NCES surveys; they are used determine program eligibility; and educational researchers regularly use them to examine differences in educational conditions (e.g., City vs. Suburban vs. Rural). This investigation examines the adequacy of these official locale assignments for public schools in urban areas. I argue that the criteria and classifications used to assign geographic locales to urban public schools are technically, theoretically, and spatially inadequate. The results of this investigation are based on a review of educational and non-educational research, as well as a case study of locale assignments for 1,826 schools and 1,174,484 students in the Baltimore-Washington DC metropolitan area. The analysis incorporates demographic and geographic data from Census 2000, school administrative data from the NCES Common Core, and digital orthophotos of the metropolitan area to assess the adequacy of NCES school locale assignments. It relies on GIS technology to conduct a spatial comparison between the current CCD school locale model and an alternate model that corrects for key technical and theoretical shortcomings in the current CCD typology. Findings indicate that 10% of schools in the case study were inadequately assigned under the current official locale model. The primary reasons for these misassignments includes a failure to account for emerging edge cities, inadequate delineation of residential suburbs, and a failure to identify small and large towns within metropolitan areas. Inattention to these spatial issues has important implications for federal data collection efforts and for current and future research on urban education.Subjects--Topical Terms:

626645
Education, Administration.

Location, location, location: The spatial quality of urban school locale classifications in the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data.
LDR:03022nmm 2200277 4500 001 1855084
005 20040609162029.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI3096097
035 $a AAI3096097
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Geverdt, Douglas E. $3 1942907
245 1 0 $a Location, location, location: The spatial quality of urban school locale classifications in the National Center for Education Statistics' Common Core of Data.
300 $a 185 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-06, Section: A, page: 1922.
500 $a Chair: Frederick Goodman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Michigan, 2003.
520 $a As part of its mission to monitor the condition of education in the U.S., the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) assigns a geographic locale indicator to each public school in the Common Core of Data (CCD)—the official administrative universe of public schools and school districts in the U.S. These locale indicators are used to help construct representative samples for other NCES surveys; they are used determine program eligibility; and educational researchers regularly use them to examine differences in educational conditions (e.g., City vs. Suburban vs. Rural). This investigation examines the adequacy of these official locale assignments for public schools in urban areas. I argue that the criteria and classifications used to assign geographic locales to urban public schools are technically, theoretically, and spatially inadequate. The results of this investigation are based on a review of educational and non-educational research, as well as a case study of locale assignments for 1,826 schools and 1,174,484 students in the Baltimore-Washington DC metropolitan area. The analysis incorporates demographic and geographic data from Census 2000, school administrative data from the NCES Common Core, and digital orthophotos of the metropolitan area to assess the adequacy of NCES school locale assignments. It relies on GIS technology to conduct a spatial comparison between the current CCD school locale model and an alternate model that corrects for key technical and theoretical shortcomings in the current CCD typology. Findings indicate that 10% of schools in the case study were inadequately assigned under the current official locale model. The primary reasons for these misassignments includes a failure to account for emerging edge cities, inadequate delineation of residential suburbs, and a failure to identify small and large towns within metropolitan areas. Inattention to these spatial issues has important implications for federal data collection efforts and for current and future research on urban education.
590 $a School code: 0127.
650 4 $a Education, Administration. $3 626645
650 4 $a Geography. $3 524010
650 4 $a Sociology, Demography. $3 1020257
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0938
710 2 0 $a University of Michigan. $3 777416
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-06A.
790 1 0 $a Goodman, Frederick, $e advisor
790 $a 0127
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3096097