語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Predictors of treatment failure in a...
~
Lindahl, Virginia H.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Predictors of treatment failure in an alternative community treatment program.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Predictors of treatment failure in an alternative community treatment program./
作者:
Lindahl, Virginia H.
面頁冊數:
73 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: B, page: 5790.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International64-11B.
標題:
Psychology, Clinical. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3111597
ISBN:
0496591274
Predictors of treatment failure in an alternative community treatment program.
Lindahl, Virginia H.
Predictors of treatment failure in an alternative community treatment program.
- 73 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: B, page: 5790.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2004.
In recent years, the tendency to hospitalize all severely mentally ill patients in acute crisis has been reconsidered in favor of more cost-effective, community-based programs. One type of program, referred to crisis residential treatment, offers effective short-term, acute care to patients who would otherwise be voluntarily admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit. In triage settings, clinicians regularly consider whether traditional inpatient care or crisis residential treatment is more appropriate, but without the benefit of empirical research as to which patients are most likely to fail in these programs. The present study used exploratory research methods to develop a profile of these patients and then tested the predictive power of that profile on a validation subsample. Both models used five potential predictor variables: current age, age at onset, current employment status, number of hospitalizations over the lifetime, and presence of thought disorder. Of the two models developed during the exploratory phase of the study, discriminant function analysis resulted in a non-statistically significant equation that was nonetheless able to account for 19% of the variance between the "success" group and the "failure" group. The second analysis used logistic regression and resulted in a statistically significant equation predicting group membership. The model correctly classified 100% of participants in the failure group and 86.4% of participants in the success group, for an overall correct classification rate of 91.7%. When the logistic regression model was tested on the validation subsample, it was able to correctly classify 80% of the participants in the failure group and 93.3% of the participants in the success group, for an overall correct classification rate of 90.0%. Individual predictors were not significant in any of the three models. This investigation suggests that highly predictive multivariate models of failure in crisis residential treatment programs can be developed using variables already routinely assessed by clinicians. The theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed and areas for future research are highlighted.
ISBN: 0496591274Subjects--Topical Terms:
524864
Psychology, Clinical.
Predictors of treatment failure in an alternative community treatment program.
LDR
:03092nmm 2200277 4500
001
1852447
005
20060111134541.5
008
130614s2004 eng d
020
$a
0496591274
035
$a
(UnM)AAI3111597
035
$a
AAI3111597
040
$a
UnM
$c
UnM
100
1
$a
Lindahl, Virginia H.
$3
1940301
245
1 0
$a
Predictors of treatment failure in an alternative community treatment program.
300
$a
73 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-11, Section: B, page: 5790.
500
$a
Director: David A. Jobes.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Catholic University of America, 2004.
520
$a
In recent years, the tendency to hospitalize all severely mentally ill patients in acute crisis has been reconsidered in favor of more cost-effective, community-based programs. One type of program, referred to crisis residential treatment, offers effective short-term, acute care to patients who would otherwise be voluntarily admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit. In triage settings, clinicians regularly consider whether traditional inpatient care or crisis residential treatment is more appropriate, but without the benefit of empirical research as to which patients are most likely to fail in these programs. The present study used exploratory research methods to develop a profile of these patients and then tested the predictive power of that profile on a validation subsample. Both models used five potential predictor variables: current age, age at onset, current employment status, number of hospitalizations over the lifetime, and presence of thought disorder. Of the two models developed during the exploratory phase of the study, discriminant function analysis resulted in a non-statistically significant equation that was nonetheless able to account for 19% of the variance between the "success" group and the "failure" group. The second analysis used logistic regression and resulted in a statistically significant equation predicting group membership. The model correctly classified 100% of participants in the failure group and 86.4% of participants in the success group, for an overall correct classification rate of 91.7%. When the logistic regression model was tested on the validation subsample, it was able to correctly classify 80% of the participants in the failure group and 93.3% of the participants in the success group, for an overall correct classification rate of 90.0%. Individual predictors were not significant in any of the three models. This investigation suggests that highly predictive multivariate models of failure in crisis residential treatment programs can be developed using variables already routinely assessed by clinicians. The theoretical and clinical implications of these findings are discussed and areas for future research are highlighted.
590
$a
School code: 0043.
650
4
$a
Psychology, Clinical.
$3
524864
650
4
$a
Health Sciences, Mental Health.
$3
1017693
690
$a
0622
690
$a
0347
710
2 0
$a
The Catholic University of America.
$3
1019220
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
64-11B.
790
1 0
$a
Jobes, David A.,
$e
advisor
790
$a
0043
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2004
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3111597
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9201962
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入