東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The significance of state borders fo...

Follesdal, Andreas.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The significance of state borders for international distributive justice.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The significance of state borders for international distributive justice./
作者:	Follesdal, Andreas.
面頁冊數:	208 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-11, Section: A, page: 3959.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International52-11A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9211679

The significance of state borders for international distributive justice.
Follesdal, Andreas.

The significance of state borders for international distributive justice. - 208 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-11, Section: A, page: 3959.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 1991.

How should the global set of social institutions distribute income and wealth among members of different states? I present a Theory of Global Justice which supports the Bounded Significance of State Borders: The states system must satisfy the Determinate Human Needs of all, and the distribution within each state must satisfy Rawls' Difference Principle. However, justice does not require a Global Difference Principle: income and wealth need not be distributed so as to maximize the income and wealth of the globally worst off.Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

The significance of state borders for international distributive justice.
LDR:03177nmm 2200337 4500 001 1852326
005 20051230065946.5
008 130614s1991 eng d
035 $a (UnM)AAI9211679
035 $a AAI9211679
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Follesdal, Andreas. $3 658824
245 1 4 $a The significance of state borders for international distributive justice.
300 $a 208 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 52-11, Section: A, page: 3959.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 1991.
520 $a How should the global set of social institutions distribute income and wealth among members of different states? I present a Theory of Global Justice which supports the Bounded Significance of State Borders: The states system must satisfy the Determinate Human Needs of all, and the distribution within each state must satisfy Rawls' Difference Principle. However, justice does not require a Global Difference Principle: income and wealth need not be distributed so as to maximize the income and wealth of the globally worst off.
520 $a The Theory of Global Justice illuminates the status of claims to equality within contractualism. There is no general presumption for equality of condition, and only contingent grounds for equality of certain goods.
520 $a The claim to satisfaction of needs and the claim to equal income and wealth stem from two different sources: The Principle of Human Rights and The Principle of Equal Procedural Controls. The Principle of Equal Procedural Controls applies among citizens within state borders, but not among individuals in different states.
520 $a Chapter 1 presents the central concepts of the Theory of Global Justice: states systems, contractualism and impact arguments.
520 $a The Theory of Global Justice recognizes two kinds of interests as grounding claims on social institutions: Determinate Human Needs, and various controls over factors which affect our lives. Chapter 2 explains the notion of Determinate Human Needs.
520 $a Chapter 3 argues for The Principle of Human Rights. The set of international institutions must seek to secure the satisfaction of the Determinate Human Needs of all.
520 $a Chapter 4 presents the Principle of Equal Procedural Controls. Participants in important procedures can sometimes reasonably claim an equal share of procedural controls.
520 $a The Principle of Equal Procedural Controls applies differently among compatriots and among foreigners. Chapter 5 claims that this principle requires equality of Social Primary Goods and the Difference Principle among citizens.
520 $a Chapter 6 denies that the Principle of Equal Procedural Controls applies among individuals in different states in such a way as to support a Global Difference Principle. State borders thus legitimately affect individuals' grounds for claiming equal shares of procedural controls.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Political Science, International Law and Relations. $3 1017399
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0616
710 2 0 $a Harvard University. $3 528741
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 52-11A.
790 $a 0084
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 1991
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9211679