東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Autonomous learning in the leadershi...

Fisher, Shelley M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Autonomous learning in the leadership construct of challenging the process.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Autonomous learning in the leadership construct of challenging the process./
作者:	Fisher, Shelley M.
面頁冊數:	97 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-12, Section: A, page: 4461.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International65-12A.
標題:	Education, Educational Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3158532
ISBN:	0496914634

Autonomous learning in the leadership construct of challenging the process.
Fisher, Shelley M.

Autonomous learning in the leadership construct of challenging the process. - 97 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-12, Section: A, page: 4461.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2005.

This study focused on leaders understanding their own beliefs in order to become risk takers and change agents who challenge the process. Kouzes and Posner (1989) posited that reflection, innovation, creativity, and risk taking are needed to remove barriers to the status quo. Dispositional affects, such as autonomous learning (desire, initiative, persistence, and resourcefulness), are important to challenging the process. Unless employees believe that they have the necessary behavioral, cognitive, and motivational resources; they will dwell on the difficulty of the task and not exert the effort necessary to move the organization forward (Bandura, 1997). Autonomous learning and challenging the process are defined as well as shown through survey instruments; i.e., the "Challenging the Process" section of the Leader Practices Inventory (Kouzes & Posner, 1997) and the Appraisal of Learner Autonomy (Ponton, Derrick, Carr, & Hall, 2004). Surveys that addressed whether or not instruction improved autonomous learning over time (pretest, posttest, follow up) were distributed to principals, teachers, central office administrators, and university staff (N = 70) in an urban teacher education program. Research suggested instruction changes autonomous learning over time (e.g., three tests differed at the p = .05 level). Correlation among autonomous learning and challenging the process follow-up scores were found at the p < .01 level (positively and statistically related to follow-up challenging the process composite scores).

ISBN: 0496914634Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017560
Education, Educational Psychology.

Autonomous learning in the leadership construct of challenging the process.
LDR:02439nmm 2200289 4500 001 1851072
005 20051216104731.5
008 130614s2005 eng d
020 $a 0496914634
035 $a (UnM)AAI3158532
035 $a AAI3158532
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Fisher, Shelley M. $3 1938973
245 1 0 $a Autonomous learning in the leadership construct of challenging the process.
300 $a 97 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-12, Section: A, page: 4461.
500 $a Chair: Bruce E. Winston.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2005.
520 $a This study focused on leaders understanding their own beliefs in order to become risk takers and change agents who challenge the process. Kouzes and Posner (1989) posited that reflection, innovation, creativity, and risk taking are needed to remove barriers to the status quo. Dispositional affects, such as autonomous learning (desire, initiative, persistence, and resourcefulness), are important to challenging the process. Unless employees believe that they have the necessary behavioral, cognitive, and motivational resources; they will dwell on the difficulty of the task and not exert the effort necessary to move the organization forward (Bandura, 1997). Autonomous learning and challenging the process are defined as well as shown through survey instruments; i.e., the "Challenging the Process" section of the Leader Practices Inventory (Kouzes & Posner, 1997) and the Appraisal of Learner Autonomy (Ponton, Derrick, Carr, & Hall, 2004). Surveys that addressed whether or not instruction improved autonomous learning over time (pretest, posttest, follow up) were distributed to principals, teachers, central office administrators, and university staff (N = 70) in an urban teacher education program. Research suggested instruction changes autonomous learning over time (e.g., three tests differed at the p = .05 level). Correlation among autonomous learning and challenging the process follow-up scores were found at the p < .01 level (positively and statistically related to follow-up challenging the process composite scores).
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a Education, Educational Psychology. $3 1017560
650 4 $a Sociology, Theory and Methods. $3 626625
650 4 $a Education, Adult and Continuing. $3 626632
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0516
710 2 0 $a Regent University. $3 1019258
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 65-12A.
790 1 0 $a Winston, Bruce E., $e advisor
790 $a 1058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3158532