東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Independent investment research anal...

Baugh, Clifford Y.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Independent investment research analysts versus investment bank-brokerage research analysts: Differences in recommendations based on environment and situations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Independent investment research analysts versus investment bank-brokerage research analysts: Differences in recommendations based on environment and situations./
作者:	Baugh, Clifford Y.
面頁冊數:	94 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4562.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-12A.
標題:	Economics, Finance. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114263
ISBN:	0496617567

Independent investment research analysts versus investment bank-brokerage research analysts: Differences in recommendations based on environment and situations.
Baugh, Clifford Y.

Independent investment research analysts versus investment bank-brokerage research analysts: Differences in recommendations based on environment and situations. - 94 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4562.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2003.

In a recent study by Craig Dunbar (1999) of calls made, over three years, by US investment dealers to companies which had gone public and their recommendations made after that date, 37% of the buy recommendations reversed within one year. The work by Michaely and Womack (2000) has clearly shown that investment banking research is biased. Investment bank research analysts and their firms, working as underwriters, talk about their clients' stocks to boost share prices and to help sell them. Some of this is done out of fear of being passed over for future lucrative investment underwriting deals or being locked out of valuable key company information. In 2000, Thomson/First Call reported that only 1% of the 28,000 stocks recommended were sells; 24% were holds; and 75% were buys (Biller, 2001). The world of investment research is being plagued with questions regarding the validity of the information being reported to the public. Investment bank research analysts and their firms are being accused of inflating recommendations. The recent investment scandals and burst of the Internet bubble has caused some retail investors to seek the advice of independent research analysts. Retail investors want reliable investment information to assist them in making investment decisions.

ISBN: 0496617567Subjects--Topical Terms:

626650
Economics, Finance.

Independent investment research analysts versus investment bank-brokerage research analysts: Differences in recommendations based on environment and situations.
LDR:03348nmm 2200301 4500 001 1849510
005 20051203080708.5
008 130614s2003 eng d
020 $a 0496617567
035 $a (UnM)AAI3114263
035 $a AAI3114263
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 1 $a Baugh, Clifford Y. $3 1937464
245 1 0 $a Independent investment research analysts versus investment bank-brokerage research analysts: Differences in recommendations based on environment and situations.
300 $a 94 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-12, Section: A, page: 4562.
500 $a Adviser: Pan G. Yatrakis.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2003.
520 $a In a recent study by Craig Dunbar (1999) of calls made, over three years, by US investment dealers to companies which had gone public and their recommendations made after that date, 37% of the buy recommendations reversed within one year. The work by Michaely and Womack (2000) has clearly shown that investment banking research is biased. Investment bank research analysts and their firms, working as underwriters, talk about their clients' stocks to boost share prices and to help sell them. Some of this is done out of fear of being passed over for future lucrative investment underwriting deals or being locked out of valuable key company information. In 2000, Thomson/First Call reported that only 1% of the 28,000 stocks recommended were sells; 24% were holds; and 75% were buys (Biller, 2001). The world of investment research is being plagued with questions regarding the validity of the information being reported to the public. Investment bank research analysts and their firms are being accused of inflating recommendations. The recent investment scandals and burst of the Internet bubble has caused some retail investors to seek the advice of independent research analysts. Retail investors want reliable investment information to assist them in making investment decisions.
520 $a This work looks at analysts' recommendations made by independent research versus investment banking research analysts. It investigates the hypothesis that Investars(TM), an online independent research firm, provides more objective buy/sell recommendations than Wall Street brokerage firms for the Dow Jones 30 companies. It also investigates the hypothesis that Investars(TM) is more likely to alter its buy/sell recommendations with a stock decrease of 20% or more. The work shows the asymmetry of analysts' recommendations and decisions after a significant event and provides a recommendation matrix. It adds to the current literature in that: (1) it addresses the needs of the retail investor by providing information about alternatives to ground-based, non-brokerage and regional and national brokerage firms through the use of online independent research, (2) it discusses the accessibility of online independent research and its viability, and (3) it provides a comparative of information being retrieved from Investars(TM) versus First Call.
590 $a School code: 1191.
650 4 $a Economics, Finance. $3 626650
650 4 $a Business Administration, Accounting. $3 1020666
650 4 $a Business Administration, Banking. $3 1018458
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0770
710 2 0 $a Nova Southeastern University. $3 1017571
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-12A.
790 1 0 $a Yatrakis, Pan G., $e advisor
790 $a 1191
791 $a D.B.A.
792 $a 2003
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3114263